Opinion

Department of Labor & Industry v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

  • 610 Pa. 331
  • 19 A.3d 511
  • 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1100
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
May 10, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.2%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The first issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether the payments made by Excelsior Insurance to Claimant, for which Excelsior Insurance sought reimbursement from the Supersedeas Fund, constituted payments of compensation within the meaning of Section 443 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), 77 P.S. § 999(a), and were, therefore, subject to reimbursement by the Supersedeas Fund, or whether such payments constituted the payment of costs associated with obtaining the settlement of

*332

Claimant’s third-party tort action under Section 319 of the Act, 77 P.S. § 671.

The second issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:

(2) Whether equity requires that the Supersedeas Fund reimburse the insurer’s

pro rata

share of attorney fees and costs incurred by a claimant in recovering from a third-party tort feasor?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.