Opinion

Wanton v. Florida a & M University Board of Trustees

  • 41 So. 3d 434
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11715
  • 2010 WL 3156731
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Aug 11, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Thomas, Wetherell, Marstiller
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.8%

holding that substance of an order rather than its label is determinative of the order’s nature

How later courts described this case

  • holding that substance of an order rather than its label is determinative of the order’s nature

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

See Hickox v. Taylor,

933 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006);

see also Augustin v. Blount, Inc.,

573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991);

Zabawa v. Penna,

868 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (holding that substance of an order rather than its label is determinative of the order’s nature).

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.