Opinion

Barker v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING

  • 49 So. 3d 862
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19165
  • 2010 WL 5128267
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Dec 17, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Griffin, Orfinger, Lawson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.7%

“This court cannot substitute its judgment for that of an administrative agency, charged with implementing and enforcing its own statute, when that agency has imposed a penalty within the permissible range of penalties.”

How later courts described this case

  • “This court cannot substitute its judgment for that of an administrative agency, charged with implementing and enforcing its own statute, when that agency has imposed a penalty within the permissible range of penalties.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

See Mendez v. Fla. Dep’t of Health,

943 So.2d 909, 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“This court cannot substitute its judgment for that of an administrative agency, charged with implementing and enforcing its own statute, when that agency has imposed a penalty within the permissible range of penalties.”).

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.