Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 74 So. 3d 1141
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18969
  • 2011 WL 5964578
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Nov 30, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Altenbernd, Casanueva, Kelly
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.2%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frankie Brown, Jr., in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2008), is unconstitutional on its face based on the reasoning of the Federal District Court in

Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections,

802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011), which held that the statute improperly eliminated mens rea as an element of a drug offense. In this instance, the direct appeal mandate issued on December 12, 2010, which was six months prior to the issuance of

Shelton .

“The ineffectiveness of appellate counsel cannot be based upon the failure of counsel to assert a theory of law which was not at the time of the appeal fully articulated or established in the law.”

Brown v. State,

25 So.3d 78 , 80 n. 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (quoting

Alvord v. State,

396 So.2d 184, 191 (Fla.1981)). Accordingly, we deny relief.

Petition denied.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.