noting Brown’s claim was that the trial court “lacked jurisdiction to hear [his] case, where the Commonwealth failed (Footnote Continued Next Page) -5- J-S03029-16 Order affirmed. Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 1/29/2016 _______________________ (Footnote Continued) to reinstate charges against him following the court’s grant of nolle prosequi, rendering his subsequent convictions defective”
How later courts described this case
- noting Brown’s claim was that the trial court “lacked jurisdiction to hear [his] case, where the Commonwealth failed (Footnote Continued Next Page) -5- J-S03029-16 Order affirmed. Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 1/29/2016 _______________________ (Footnote Continued) to reinstate charges against him following the court’s grant of nolle prosequi, rendering his subsequent convictions defective”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
32 A.3d 260 (2011)
COM.
v.
BROWN.
No. 350 EDA 2011.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
July 7, 2011.
Affirmed.