Opinion

Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne

  • 11 N.J. Super. 433
  • 78 A.2d 429
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Jan 17, 1951
Status
Published
On the bench
Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogers
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.7%

The opinion

11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)

78 A.2d 429

CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1951.

Decided January 17, 1951.

*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.

Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.