Opinion

O'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics

605 Pa. 129
987 A.2d 715
2009 Pa. LEXIS 2896

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Dec 29, 2009
Status: Published
On the bench: Per Curiam
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 49.9%

order granting allocatur in part

How later courts described this case

order granting allocatur in part

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did Cozen O’Connor have standing to obtain a declaratory judgment where Cozen O’Connor alleged in its complaint that it intended to forgive the outstanding debt of the Friends of Bob Brady Campaign Committee at one time and

in toto,

thereby exposing itself to potential civil penalties

*130

and other sanctions under Phila. Code § 20-612 for violations of Phila. Code § 20-1002?

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.