holding that proceeds obtained by a claimant through his own UM insurance policy, the premiums for which were paid exclusively by the claimant, are different from proceeds *476 obtained from a third party, and therefore are not subject to subrogation
How later courts described this case
- holding that proceeds obtained by a claimant through his own UM insurance policy, the premiums for which were paid exclusively by the claimant, are different from proceeds *476 obtained from a third party, and therefore are not subject to subrogation
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
Madame Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.