The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1003
PETER PRYCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge.
(8:07-cv-03284-CBD)
Submitted: February 14, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Corbin, THOMAS B. CORBIN, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellant. Linda Hitt Thatcher, Robert J. Baror, THATCHER LAW
FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Pryce appeals the magistrate judge’s order
entering judgment for the Appellee following the jury’s verdict
in favor of the Appellee on Pryce’s claim of retaliation. As
Pryce failed to file a post-verdict motion pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 50, and failed to move for a new trial pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59, however, this court is without power to review
his claim regarding the sufficiency of the evidence. See
Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift-Erich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394,
400-07 (2006); see also A Helping Hand, LLC v. Baltimore County,
515 F.3d 356, 369-70 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we affirm
the magistrate judge’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2