Opinion

Hodge v. Board of County Commissioners

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 4, 2011
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2290

HAROLD H. HODGE, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; BARBARA STINNETT,

Commissioner, in her individual capacity and official

capacity; LINDA KELLEY, Commissioner, in her individual

capacity and official capacity; WILSON PARRAN,

Commissioner, in his individual capacity and official

capacity; ROBERT B. RIDDLE, Judge, in his individual

capacity and official capacity; C. BUCKIE DOWELL, in his

individual capacity and official capacity; JAMES CARPENTER,

in his individual capacity and official capacity; STATE OF

MARYLAND; SMILEY, Police Officer, in his individual

capacity and official capacity; JOHN DOE 1-2, Unknown

police officers, in their individual capacity and official

capacity; CALVERT COUNTY (local government); GERALD CLARK,

Commissioner, in his individual capacity and official

capacity also known as Jerry,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10-

cv-02396-RWT)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Harold H. Hodge, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006) for failure to state a

claim on which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Bd. of Cnty.

Comm’rs, No. 8:10-cv-02396-RWT (D. Md. filed Oct. 14, 2010 &

entered Oct. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.