Opinion

Frank v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Apr 17, 2000
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10678

Conference Calendar

DONALD R. FRANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY BROWN, Jones County

District Attorney,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-138-C

- - - - - - - - - -

April 14, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald R. Frank, Texas prisoner # 208829, is BARRED from

proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation

Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at least three prior

occasions while incarcerated, Frank has brought an action or

appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed as

frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-10678

- 2 -

be granted. Frank v. Garner, No. 96-40375 (5th Cir. July 31,

1996) (affirming district court’s dismissal of his civil rights

suit as frivolous); Frank v. Reno, No. 1:97-CV-165-C (N.D. Tex.

Aug. 6, 1997) (dismissing writ of mandamus as frivolous and for

failure to state a claim upon which mandamus may issue); and

Frank v. Calhoun, No. 6:98-CV-128 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 1998)

(dismissing as frivolous 28 U.S.C. § 1983 action against state

court judge).

Accordingly, Frank’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may

not bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action

or proceeding under § 1915 while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. See § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED.

Frank has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.

IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.