The opinion
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 03-1521
DAVID E. BROWN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL T. MALONEY, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Nathaniel M Gorton, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Circuit Judge,
Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
David E. Brown on brief pro se.
Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and
Kevin A. Anahory, Legal Division, Department of Correction, on
brief for appellees.
July 27, 2004
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and
record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by
the district court. Among other considerations, the appellant
failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act
and the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 749; Parker v. Universidad
de Puerto Rico, 225 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 2000). The court did not
abuse its discretion in denying his second motion to amend his
complaint. Mirpuri v. Act Mfg., Inc., 212 F.3d 624 (1st Cir. 2000).
Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
-2-