Opinion

Schimelfenig v. Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners

  • 605 Pa. 379
  • 989 A.2d 1276
  • 2010 Pa. LEXIS 380
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 9, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the Joint Application for Permission to File Post-Submis

*380

sion Communication, we will dismiss the appeal. The Joint Application seeks leave to file a post-submission communication in the nature of an application to dismiss the first question presented on appeal on mootness grounds, given that a new reciprocal arrangement with the state of Oregon, concerning admission to the bar, effective January 1, 2010, has opened the door to petitioner’s admission to the Pennsylvania bar under the existing Rules. In light of this material change in circumstances, there is no need to pass upon either question on appeal and, in the interest of judicial economy, there is no need to file the requested post-submission communication. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED and the Joint Application is DENIED as MOOT.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.