Opinion

Barco v. School Board of Pinellas County

  • 946 So. 2d 1244
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 503
  • 2007 WL 120588
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jan 19, 2007
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 75.0%

The opinion

946 So.2d 1244 (2007)

Paul J. BARCO, Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF PINELLAS COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 2D05-4915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 19, 2007.

Samuel R. Mandelbaum of Mandelbaum, Fitzsimmons & Hewitt, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Lucas and Brian A. Bolves of Bricklemyer Smolker & Bolves, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Paul J. Barco appeals the trial court's order that denied his motion to tax costs. The trial court denied the motion because it was not served within "30 days after the filing of the judgment" in accordance with the initial version of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525. We affirm the trial court's order. See Swann v. Dinan, 884 So.2d 398, 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). However, we certify direct conflict with the following decisions: Martin Daytona Corp. v. Strickland Construction Services, 941 So.2d 1220, 1225-26 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Byrne-Henry v. Hertz Corp., 927 So.2d 66, 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Swift v. Wilcox, 924 So.2d 885, 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); and Norris v. Treadwell, 907 So.2d 1217, 1218-19 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), review dismissed, 934 So.2d 1207 (Fla.2006).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

ALTENBERND, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.