Opinion

Brown v. Nottoway Correctional Center

  • 408 F. App'x 773
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 24, 2011
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Niemeyer, Motz, Hamilton
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 65.9%

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7210

VINCENT MCKINLEY BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

NOTTOWAY CORRECTIONAL CENTER; WARDEN HARRIS L. DIGGS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00068-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: November 23, 2010 Decided: January 24, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent McKinley Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent McKinley Brown seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2006) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket

on February 12, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on August

2, 2010. * Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

*

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

2

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.