Opinion

Ex Parte Ray

  • 809 So. 2d 891
  • 2001 WL 845800
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jul 27, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Lyons
On the bench
Lyons
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 55.2%

"In order to justify a challenge for cause, there must be a statutory ground or some matter that imports absolute bias or favor and leaves nothing to the discretion of the trial court."

How later courts described this case

  • "In order to justify a challenge for cause, there must be a statutory ground or some matter that imports absolute bias or favor and leaves nothing to the discretion of the trial court."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition, we note that the discussion by the Court of Criminal Appeals in Ray v. State , 809 So.2d 875 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), concerning the testimony of the medical examiner and the testimony of Investigator Roy Freine is unnecessary to the resolution of the issue concerning the sufficiency of the corroborative evidence.

WRIT DENIED.

Moore, C.J., and Houston, See, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur.

*Page 1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.