Opinion

Jones v. Board of Supervisors

  • 180 F.3d 264
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Apr 29, 1999
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60294

Summary Calendar

LARRY LEE JONES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, of Franklin County, Mississippi;

JAMES NEWMAN, Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CV-323-LN

- - - - - - - - - -

April 28, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Lee Jones, Mississippi prisoner #19614, appeals from

the grant of summary judgment for the defendants in his

prisoner’s civil rights action. Jones contends that the district

court erred by granting summary judgment for the Board of

Supervisors and for Sheriff James Newman in his official capacity

because the defendants should be liable for Sheriff Newman’s

abuse of his policy-making capacity. He argues that a list of

dates written by Sheriff Newman created a genuine issue of

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

No. 98-60294

-2-

material fact regarding when Sheriff Newman knew of the injury to

his (Jones’s) hand and therefore of his need for medical

treatment. Jones finally contends that the district court

deprived him of his right to a jury trial by granting summary

judgment for the defendants.

Regarding Jones’s medical-care claims, we have reviewed the

record and the briefs of the parties and we find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment on

those claims for essentially the same reasons as relied upon by

the district court. See Jones v. Bd. of Supervisors, No. 3:97-

CV-323-LN (S.D. Miss. Apr. 16, 1998). Finally, Jones’s right to

a jury trial was not violated by the grant of summary judgment.

Plaisance v. Phelps, 845 F.2d 107, 108 (5th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.