Opinion

In Re MacGregor (FIN) Oy

  • 174 S.W.3d 419
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 9329
  • 2005 WL 3005488
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Nov 10, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Keyes
On the bench
Evelyn v. Keyes
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.5%

The opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REMAND

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

On July 10, 2003, we issued our original opinion in the above-referenced cause.

See In re MacGregor (FIN) Oy,

126 S.W.3d 176,184-85 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, orig. proceeding). On May 20, 2005, the Texas Supreme Court conditionally granted mandamus relief and ordered this Court to “vacate its order compelling KBR to ‘arbitrate all claims.’ ”

In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.,

166 S.W.3d 732, 742 (Tex.2005). In our July 10, 2003 opinion, we decreed:

The trial court is ordered to vacate its order denying MacGregor’s plea in abatement and motion to compel arbitra

*420

tion, to issue an order compelling KBR to arbitrate all claims, and to stay all proceedings pending arbitration. Only if the trial court fails to comply with these directions shall we instruct the clerk to issue the writ.

In re MacGregor,

126 S.W.3d at 184-85 . In accordance with the supreme court’s order, we vacate only the herein above-quoted decree of our July 10, 2003 opinion and issue the following decree in its stead:

The trial court is ordered to vacate its order denying MacGregor’s plea in abatement and motion to compel arbitration and to stay all proceedings pending arbitration. Only if the trial court fails to comply with these directions shall we instruct the clerk to issue the writ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.