Opinion

Cupp v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 4, 2010
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.3%

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8214

STEVEN CUPP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff; CECIL NICHOLS; JOYCE

FRANCIS, Warden; DEBRA RANKIN; KUMA DEBOO; K. M. WHITE;

HARRELL WATTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va.

Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.