Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 25, 2010
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BOBBY JAMES BROWN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:00-

cr-00100-AMD-1)

Submitted: June 16, 2010 Decided: June 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby James Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United

States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby James Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Brown, No. 1:00-cr-00100-AMD-1 (D. Md. April 22,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.