Opinion

Iafelice v. City of Passaic

  • 141 N.J. Super. 436
  • 358 A.2d 805
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
May 18, 1976
Status
Published
On the bench
Judges Halpern, Crane and Michels
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.1%

The opinion

141 N.J. Super. 436 (1976)

358 A.2d 805

ANTHONY IAFELICE AND F. WILLIAM KOESTNER, A PARTNERSHIP TRADING AS K & I LAUNDROMAT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF PASSAIC, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC, NEW JERSEY, AND RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 4, 1976.

Decided May 18, 1976.

Before Judges HALPERN, CRANE and MICHELS.

Mr. Joseph L. Freiman argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Joseph A. Pojanowski, III, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Pojanowski attorney for respondent Rent Leveling Board of the City of Passaic; Mr. Leonard M. Bitterman, attorney for respondent City of Passaic).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Schwartz in his written opinion reported in Gardens v. City of Passaic, 130 N.J. Super. 369 (Law Div. 1974). See Hutton Pk. Gardens ( Hutton Lafayette Apts. Co. ) v. Town Council of Town of West Orange, 68 N.J. 543 (1975); Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576 (1975), and Troy Hills Village v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp. Council, 68 N.J. 604 (1975).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.