Opinion

Transport of New Jersey v. Watler

  • 79 N.J. 400
  • 400 A.2d 61
  • 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1207
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Apr 10, 1979
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
30 cases
Authority
More cited than 93.1%

qualified self-insurer pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:4-12 is required to afford uninsured motorist protection in accordance with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1

How later courts described this case

  • qualified self-insurer pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:4-12 is required to afford uninsured motorist protection in accordance with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1
  • noting certificate of self-insurance is "policy” for purposes of UIM required for all vehicles
  • statute requiring all automobile-liability policies to include uninsured-motorist coverage applies to all vehicles registered or principally garaged in state

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*401

Per Curiam.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Botter’s opinion, subject to the following comments. Transport of New Jersey (TNJ), as a self-insurer, is not a “qualified person” under

N. J. 8. A.

39 :6 — 63 and thus is not entitled to recover from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Eund. The certificate of self-insurance issued to TNJ pursuant to

N. J. 8. A.

39:6" — 53 is a “policy” under which TNJ is insured for purposes of

N. J. S. A.

39:6-62. Incorporated within this “policy” of self-insurance is the uninsured motorist coverage required of all motor vehicle insurance policies by

N. J. S. A.

17:28-l.l.

Of. Comorote v. Massey,

110

N. J. Super.

124, 127-128 (Law Div. 1970) (self-insurer must provide the omnibus coverage required of all insurance policies by

N. J. 8. A.

39 :6-46 (a)).

We affirm the judgment setting aside the order for payment from the Eund and we affirm the remand to the trial court to permit plaintiff to proceed against Watler. In those proceedings plaintiff shall have leave to prove that there had been a waiver of the sufficiency of service of process on defendant Watler. See

B.

4:6-7.

Affirmed, as modified.

For affirmance as

modified^-Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeord, Sohreiber and Handler — 7.

For reversal

— None.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.