Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 132 Ga. App. 200
  • 207 S.E.2d 682
  • 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1646
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Filed
Jun 20, 1974
Status
Published
Author
Eberhardt
On the bench
Eberhardt, Deen, Stolz
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.2%

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Mindock v. State, 187 Ga. App. 508 (1988)

    132 Ga. App. 200 (2) (207 SE2d 682) (1974), that exception is inapplicable here.
    Court of Appeals of GeorgiaJun 13, 1988Read it

The opinion

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, together with defendants Flinchum, Peterson, George, Brannon, Fagala, Aiken and Schmalz, were jointly indicted for theft by taking in a check kiting operation as a result of which the First Georgia Bank lost in excess of $300,000.

Defendants Aiken, Flinchum and Brown were tried separately and in each case verdicts of guilty were returned. In Brown’s appeal error is enumerated on the admission of testimony of co-conspirators Brannon and Peterson, the enumeration being based upon Code § 38-414 which prohibits the admission of a confession of a co-conspirator made after termination of the conspiracy as against any save himself. Error is also enumerated on the overruling of a motion for new trial on the general grounds.

Held:

1. The general grounds are without merit. The evidence is ample to support a conviction.

2. The admission of a confession made by a co-conspirator after termination of the conspiracy is quite a different thing from the admission of sworn testimony by a co-conspirator and this has been recognized by the Supreme Court in

Pippin v. State,

205 Ga. 316 (12) ( 53 SE2d 482 ), where he is held to be a competent witness to testify as to any relevant matter concerning the charge, and that in this situation Code § 38-414 has no application.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen and Stolz, JJ., concur.

*201

Nick G. Lambros,

for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Richard E. Hicks, Morris H. Rosenberg,

for appellee.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.