Opinion

Swenson v. Thibaut

  • 296 N.C. 740
  • 254 S.E.2d 181
  • 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1295
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Mar 6, 1979
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.2%

The opinion

254 S.E.2d 181 (1979)

296 N.C. 740

Norman V. SWENSON, George C. Snyder, Frank O. Sherrill, William L. Pender, John R. Pender, III, Mary Rogers Pender Murphy, Doris Hare White, D. Lacy Keesler, S. Dewey Keesler, Carson Insurance Agency, Inc., A. H. Kimball, Olivia Brown Thomas, Helen Brown Kimball, Nell V. Bates, Rose Dupree, Ann Dupree King, Paul B. Beatty, Robert L. Taylor, Stanley E. Edlund, Patricia A. Edlund, Sharon S. Standifer, Virginia T. Johnson, Frances M. Vinson, Mattie S. Gardner, Robert R. Rhyne, Betty F. Rhyne, James M. Gilfillin, John W. Powell, Rebecca P. Pittman, T. F. Morgan, Grace E. Morgan, Marie Dowd Latimer, and John D. King derivatively in the right of All American Assurance Company

v.

Chariest D. THIBAUT, Jr., Thomas H. Clark, Ben F. Thompson, Jr., George C. Wiemer, Jr., Robert E. Wiemer, Herman Taylor, Jr., Travis E. Nichols, Lelier J. Leleux, W. W. Hawkins, J. Malcolm Duhe, Clifford C. Comeaux, Jr., J. Alfred Bagnaud, Emery J. Bares, Paul G. Backus, and Russell E. Walton and All American Assurance Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 6, 1979.

Bryant, Groves & Essex, for defendants Thibaut and Comeaux, Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, for defendants Clark, Thompson, Nichols, Leleux, Hawkins, Duhe, Begnaud, Bares, Backus and Walton.

Sanford, Cannon, Adams & McCullough, for defendant Taylor.

Ellison & Ellison, for defendants Wiemers.

Stern, Rendleman, Isaacson & Klepfer, Joyner & Howison, for defendant All American Assurance Company.

*182 Cansler, Lockhart, Parker & Young, P. A., Helms, Mullis & Johnston, for plaintiffs.

Defendants, Chariest D. Thibaut, Jr. and Clifford C. Comeaux, Jr., notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31, 39 N.C.App. 77 , 250 S.E.2d 279 . Petition denied. Motion of the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.