finding a 1 petitioner’s claim that he should be resentenced in light of Romero was not cognizable on federal 2 habeas review
How later courts described this case
- finding a 1 petitioner’s claim that he should be resentenced in light of Romero was not cognizable on federal 2 habeas review
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis
granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of
Lockyer
v.
Andrade, ante,
p. 63.