Opinion

Desai

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
May 6, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.7%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANDAV CAPITAL,

NISHA DESAI,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Case No. 25-cv-33 (JMF)

PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC.,

PAYPAL VENTURES,

Defendants.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DISCLOSURE AND USE OF

DISCOVERY MATERIALS

Plaintiffs Andav Capital and Nisha Desai, and Defendants PayPal Holdings, Inc. and PayPal

Ventures (collectively, the “Parties”), anticipate that discovery in this Action will involve the produc-

tion of documents, testimony, and other information containing confidential, proprietary, commer-

cially sensitive, private, and/or privileged material, including without limitation nonpublic business

records, investment and diligence materials, fund-performance information, internal communications

and analyses, trade secrets, personally identifiable information (“PII”), and other information the dis-

closure of which could cause competitive, commercial, privacy, or other cognizable harm. Good cause

therefore exists under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) for the entry of a protective order gov-

erning the disclosure and use of such materials in this Action.

The Parties accordingly stipulate to, and request that the Court enter, this Stipulated Protective

Order Regarding Disclosure and Use of Discovery Materials (the “Order” or “Protective Order”),

which shall govern the handling of Discovery Material produced by Parties and non-parties in this

Action. This Order is intended to facilitate discovery, protect legitimately confidential information,

and preserve applicable privileges and protections, while limiting confidentiality designations to mate-

rial that qualifies for protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, applicable law, and this

Court’s rules and practices.

Nothing in this Order authorizes the filing under seal of any document. Any request to file

material under seal or in redacted form must separately comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Proce-

dure, the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, and the Court’s Individual Rules and

Practices.

I. DEFINITIONS

1. “Action” means Andav Capital et al. v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al., Case No. 25-cv-33

(S.D.N.Y.).

2. “Challenging Party” means any Party or non-party that challenges a confidentiality

designation under this Order.

3. “Discovery Material” means all documents, electronically stored information, testi-

mony, transcripts, tangible things, and other information, including materials produced by any non-

party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained, that are produced, dis-

closed, or generated in connection with discovery in this Action pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, a Court order, subpoena, civil investigative demand, or any agreement or stipulation among

the Parties.

4. “Designating Party” means any Party or non-party that designates Discovery Material

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under

this Order

5. “Disclose” (and any form of that term) means to distribute, provide, describe, sum-

marize, paraphrase, reveal, or otherwise make available for access, viewing, use, or copying any Dis-

covery Material or the information contained therein.

6. “Document” shall have the broadest meaning permitted by Federal Rule of Civil Pro-

cedure 34(a)(1)(A)-(B) and Local Civil Rule 26.3(c)(2).

7. “PII” means personally identifiable information, including but not limited to Social

Security numbers, taxpayer-identification numbers, dates of birth, financial-account numbers, pass-

port numbers, driver’s-license numbers, home addresses, personal telephone numbers, personal email

addresses, and other information subject to protection or redaction under Federal Rule of Civil Pro-

cedure 5.2 or other applicable law.

8. “Producing Party” means any Party or non-party that discloses or produces any Dis-

covery Material in this Action.

9. “Protected Material” means any Discovery Material designated as “CONFIDEN-

TIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as provided for in this

Order.

10. “Receiving Party” means any Party who receives Discovery Material from a Producing

Party.

11. “Termination Date” means the later of: (a) the date on which this Action is finally

resolved by dismissal, settlement, final judgment, or other disposition; or (b) the date on which all

appeals, re-hearings, reconsideration proceedings, or remands relating to this Action have been ex-

hausted or the time to pursue them has expired.

II. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

1. Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties or ordered by the Court, Protected Material

shall be used by a Receiving Party solely for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action,

and for no other purpose whatsoever. Protected Material shall not be used or disclosed, directly or

indirectly, for any other purpose.

2. Protected Material may be disclosed only to the persons, and under the conditions,

expressly authorized by this Order. Each Receiving Party shall store and maintain Protected Material

in a secure manner and at a location and in a form that ensures that access is reasonably limited to

persons authorized under this Order.

3. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protection on all

disclosures during discovery, or in the course of making initial or supplemental disclosures under Rule

26(a). Designations under this Order shall be made only on a good-faith basis and only to the extent

the material qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), applicable law, and

this Order. If it comes to a Producing Party’s attention that designated material does not qualify for

protection at all—or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted—the Producing Party

must promptly notify all other Parties in writing that it is withdrawing or modifying the designation.

4. A Party’s compliance with this Order, or failure to challenge a designation immediately,

shall not operate as an admission that any particular material is or is not confidential, privileged, dis-

coverable, relevant, or admissible. This Order is without prejudice to any Party’s right to challenge any

designation, object to any discovery request, or seek additional protection from the Court.

5. The protections conferred by this Order do not extend to information that: (a) is pub-

licly known through no violation of this Order; (b) becomes public through no violation of this Order;

(c) was lawfully known to the Receiving Party, without confidentiality restriction, before disclosure by

the Producing Party; (d) is lawfully obtained by the Receiving Party from a source not under an obli-

gation of confidentiality to the Producing Party; or (e) is disclosed by the Producing Party to a third

party without restriction on further disclosure.

III. SCOPE

1. The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material, but also:

(a) any information copied, extracted, summarized, described, characterized, paraphrased, or other-

wise derived therefrom; and (b) all copies, excerpts, compilations, notes, memoranda, summaries,

analyses, abstracts, or other documents or materials that contain, reflect, quote from, or disclose Pro-

tected Material.

2. This Order applies to discovery, pretrial proceedings, and post-trial proceedings in this

Action, whether the material is produced by a Party or a non-party. This Order does not, by itself,

govern the treatment of Protected Material at trial or in open court. Any Party may seek further relief

from the Court concerning the use, treatment, or protection of Protected Material at any hearing, trial,

or other public proceeding.

3. Nothing in this Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party’s own disclosure or

use of its own Discovery Material for any purpose. Nothing in this Order shall preclude a Producing

Party from showing its own Discovery Material to an individual who authored, prepared, received, or

previously had lawful access to that material.

4. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to use any Pro-

tected Material in Court or in any Court filing in this Action, provided that the Party complies with

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Local Rules of the Southern

District of New York, the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, and any other applicable rules or

orders governing redaction, sealing, or public use of protected information. A Producing Party may

consent in writing to the public filing or use of its Protected Material by another Party.

5. Nothing in this Order authorizes any Party to file Protected Material under seal or in

redacted form merely because it has been designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFI-

DENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Any request to file material under seal or in redacted

form must be made separately, must be narrowly tailored, and must comply with the Court’s Individual

Rules and Practices and applicable law governing public access to judicial documents.

6. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any Party’s right to object to the produc-

tion, use, or admissibility of any document, testimony, communication, or other Discovery Material,

including on grounds of relevance, burden, proportionality, privilege, work product, immunity, confi-

dentiality, or any other objection available under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal

Rules of Evidence, or other applicable law.

7. This Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party or non-party to seek further

or additional protection for any Discovery Material, to seek modification of this Order, or to seek

relief from any provision of this Order, including without limitation an order that certain matter not

be produced at all, that specified matter be produced only on stated conditions, or that certain material

does not qualify for the protection or level of protection asserted.

8. A Party’s compliance with this Order, or failure to challenge a designation immediately,

shall not operate as an admission that any particular material is or is not confidential, privileged, dis-

coverable, relevant, or admissible.

IV. DURATION

1. Even after the Termination Date, and unless otherwise indicated in this Order, the

confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Producing Party agrees

otherwise in writing or an order from this Court otherwise directs.

2. The expiration or termination of this Action, or the termination of any person’s in-

volvement in this Action, shall not relieve any person of the obligations imposed by this Order with

respect to Protected Material received during the pendency of this Action.

V. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

1. Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material disclosed or pro-

duced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this Action only for prosecuting, defend-

ing, or attempting to settle this Action, and for no other purpose whatsoever. Protected Material shall

not be used, directly or indirectly, for any business, commercial, competitive, personal, investment,

fundraising, regulatory, or other purpose unrelated to this Action. Protected Material may be disclosed

only to the categories of persons, and under the conditions, expressly described in this Order. Pro-

tected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party in a secure manner and at a loca-

tion, and with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards, reasonably designed to ensure that

access is limited to persons authorized under this Order.

2. Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall be con-

strued to prevent counsel for a Receiving Party from advising that Party with respect to this Action

based in whole or in part upon Protected Material, provided that counsel does not disclose the Pro-

tected Material itself, its specific contents, or the fact of any particular Protected Material’s existence

except as permitted by this Order.

3. Persons with Prior Lawful Access. Nothing in this Order shall prevent a Producing

Party from using or disclosing its own Discovery Material for any purpose. Nothing in this Order shall

preclude a Receiving Party from showing Protected Material to an individual who authored, prepared,

received, or previously had lawful access to that material, provided that any further disclosure by the

Receiving Party otherwise complies with this Order.

4. Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way the use or disclosure by a

Receiving Party of material or information that: (a) is or becomes publicly known through no violation

of this Order; (b) was lawfully known to the Receiving Party, without restriction, independent of the

Producing Party before disclosure in this Action; (c) is lawfully obtained by the Receiving Party after

disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and was not bound by a duty of

confidentiality to the Producing Party with respect to that information; (d) was produced, disclosed,

or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of

confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (e) is disclosed with the written consent of the

Designating Party; or (f) is disclosed pursuant to further order of the Court.

5. No Admission; Other Rights Preserved. Nothing in this Section, or in this Order,

shall operate as an admission that any particular material is confidential, privileged, relevant, admissi-

ble, or discoverable, nor shall it prejudice any Party’s right to seek additional protection, to challenge

any designation, or to object to any discovery request or disclosure.

VI. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

1. Available Designations. Any Producing Party may designate Discovery Material

with one of the following designations, provided that the Producing Party has a good-faith basis for

the designation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), applicable law, and this Order: “CON-

FIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

2. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate qualified ma-

terial does not, standing alone, waive the right to designate it later. Upon written notice of a corrected

designation, the Receiving Party shall make reasonable efforts to treat the material in accordance with

the corrected designation from that point forward and to retrieve and relabel any prior copies distrib-

uted inconsistently with the corrected designation.

3. Written Discovery and Documents and Tangible Things. Written discovery, doc-

uments (including electronically stored information, or “ESI,” as that phrase is used in Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 34), and tangible things that meet the requirements for the confidentiality designations

above may be so designated by affixing the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDEN-

TIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as appropriate, to each page of the written material that

contains Protected Material or, if the documents are being produced in their native format, to the file

name or a slip sheet referencing the Protected Material, at the time that such documents are produced

or such information is disclosed, or as soon thereafter as the Producing Party notifies the Receiving

Party of the confidential nature of the information or material disclosed. For digital files being pro-

duced, the Producing Party may mark each viewable page or image that contains Protected Material

with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES

ONLY,” as appropriate, and/or mark the file name, slip sheet, medium, container, and/or communi-

cation in which the digital files were contained with the appropriate designation.

4. Materials Made Available for Inspection. A Producing Party that makes original

documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the

inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspec-

tion and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has iden-

tified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which doc-

uments, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the

specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate designation as described in Par-

agraph 3 of this Section.

5. Depositions and Testimony. Parties or testifying persons or entities, or their coun-

sel, may designate depositions and other testimony with the appropriate designation by indicating on

the record at the time the testimony is given or by sending written notice of how portions of the

transcript of the testimony are designated within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the final transcript

of the testimony. If no indication on the record is made, all information disclosed during a deposition

shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL” until the 21-day period for designating the final transcripts as

described above has passed, unless the Parties agree in writing or on the record or the Court orders

otherwise. Any Protected Material that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to the

provisions of this Protective Order. In such cases the court reporter shall be informed of this Protec-

tive Order and shall be required to operate in a manner consistent with this Protective Order. In the

event the deposition is videotaped, the original and all copies of the videotape shall be marked by the

video technician to indicate that the contents of the videotape are subject to this Protective Order,

substantially along the lines of “This videotape contains confidential testimony used in this case and

is not to be viewed or the contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the terms

of the operative Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the parties or

order of the Court.” Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depo-

sitions any person, other than the deponent, deponent’s counsel, counsel for the Parties, the stenog-

rapher and/or videographer (if any), who is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or

access Protected Material based on the designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion

shall apply only to the specific periods of examination or testimony that pertain or relate to such

Protected Material.

6. Discovery Material Designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” A Producing Party may

designate Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” only if it contains or reflects information that

the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith believes qualifies for protection under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 26(c). Examples of such information include material that a Party reasonably and

in good faith believes to contain or to disclose information that the Party, in the ordinary course of

business, does not or would not publicly disclose, or information that a Party is under a preexisting

obligation to maintain as confidential. A designation shall not be made merely because the material is

produced in discovery.

7. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Producing Party,

a Receiving Party may disclose material designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to the following per-

sons:

(a) the Parties to this Action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers;

(b) The Receiving Party’s outside counsel of record in this Action, as well as part-

ners, associates, and other employees of any such counsel’s law firm (including without limi-

tation paralegals and support staff) to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the infor-

mation for this litigation;

(c) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to assist in

this Action (including such of the expert’s or consultant’s assistants or support staff as are

reasonably necessary to facilitate the expert’s or consultant’s work), provided that (A) disclo-

sure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such work; and (B) such expert or

consultant (and any reasonably necessary assistants or support staff) has agreed to be bound

by the provisions of this Protective Order by signing a copy of the “Agreement to Be Bound

by Protective Order” (Exhibit A). Any “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” signed

by a Party’s outside expert or consultant does not need to be disclosed or circulated to other

Parties until the Termination Date or as required pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Pro-

cedure;

(d) as to any document, its author, addressee, and any other person indicated on

the face of the document as having received a copy;

(e) any witness who, in the good-faith belief of counsel for a Party, may be called

to testify at trial or deposition in this Action, provided such person has agreed to be bound by

the provisions of this Protective Order by signing a copy of the “Agreement to Be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A);

(f) The Court, jury, and court personnel, pursuant to this protective order and any

applicable rules regarding the filing and/or use of materials designated for protection;

(g) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record testimony

taken in this Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who

have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(h) Document processing and hosting vendors, and graphics, translation, design,

and/or trial consulting services to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation

and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and

(i) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party or by

order of the Court.

VII. DISCOVERY MATERIAL DESIGNATED AS “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – AT-

TORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

1. A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “HIGHLY CONFIDEN-

TIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it contains information that is trade secret and/or com-

mercially sensitive such that the Producing Party reasonably and in good faith determines that dis-

closure of the information to the Receiving Party is likely to cause harm to its competitive position

or the competitive position of a non-party who authored or produced the information. Examples

of such information or material include trade secrets and other proprietary information; confidential

business information and practices; personal information which, if disclosed to one of the parties in

the context of this Action, could reasonably be expected to result in severe financial or emotional

harm; and material that a Party is under a pre-existing obligation to a non-party to treat as personal

or confidential. While the parties agree that a Producing Party may designate the foregoing categories

of information as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” they do not

waive any rights to challenge the designations of these categories, as necessary.

2. All Protected Material designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

EYES ONLY” shall be produced in a manner reasonably calculated to preserve its confidentiality. To

the extent such material is produced electronically, it shall be transmitted or made available through

encrypted media, encrypted transfer, or a secure document-hosting platform with access controls rea-

sonably designed to limit access to persons authorized under this Order, such as, but not limited to,

ShareFile. Any electronic copies maintained by a Receiving Party or its counsel shall be maintained in

an access-controlled environment.

3. Printed copies of materials designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTOR-

NEYS’ EYES ONLY” maintained by the Receiving Party must be kept in a secure location, such as

a locked storage container, file cabinet, or room, when not in use.

4. Except as expressly provided in this Order, absent express written permission from

the Producing Party, the Receiving Party shall minimize the creation of copies, duplicates, or images

(whether electronic or in hard copy) of Discovery Materials designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL

– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Wherever practicable, such materials shall be referenced in corre-

spondence, pleadings, or Court filings by production Bates number rather than reproduced. Any cop-

ies, duplicates, or images reasonably necessary for this Action must themselves be labeled “HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

5. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or expressly permitted in writing by the Pro-

ducing Party, a Receiving Party may disclose material designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to the following persons:

(a) The Receiving Party’s outside counsel of record in this Action, as well as part-

ners, associates, and other employees of any such counsel (including without limitation para-

legals and support staff) to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for

this litigation;

(b) The Receiving Party’s in-house counsel, including without limitation paralegals

and support staff in the Receiving Party’s legal department, provided that they agree not to

disclose the information to any other employees of the Receiving Party who are not members

of the legal department and that they have agreed to be bound by the provisions of this Pro-

tective Order by signing a copy of the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit

A);

(c) as to any document, its author, addressee, and any other person indicated on

the face of the document as having received a copy;

(d) Any outside expert or consultant retained by the Receiving Party to assist in

this Action (including such of the expert’s or consultant’s assistants or support staff as are

reasonably necessary to facilitate the expert’s or consultant’s work), provided that (A) disclo-

sure is only to the extent reasonably necessary to perform such work; (B) such expert or con-

sultant (and any reasonably necessary assistants or support staff) has agreed to be bound by

the provisions of this Protective Order by signing a copy of the “Agreement to Be Bound by

Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and (C) disclosure complies with the procedure set forth below

for disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” material to

outside experts and consultants. Any “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” signed

by a Party’s outside expert or consultant does not need to be disclosed or circulated to other

Parties until the Termination Date or as required pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Pro-

cedure;

(e) The Court, jury, and court personnel, subject to this protective order and any

applicable rules regarding the filing and/or use of materials designated for protection;

(f) Court reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record testimony

taken in this Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who

have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(g) Document processing and hosting vendors, and graphics, design, and/or trial

consulting services to whom disclosure is necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(h) Any other person with the prior written consent of the Producing Party or by

order of the Court.

6. Except as to the author, addressee, stated recipient, custodian, or a person who other-

wise previously possessed or lawfully knew the specific information contained in the material, and

except as to the disclosures expressly permitted in Paragraph 5 of this Section, material designated

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall not be disclosed to any current

officer, director, member, employee, investment professional, or other representative of a Receiving

Party absent the Producing Party’s written consent or further order of the Court.

7. The Receiving Party shall not disclose any material designated “HIGHLY CONFI-

DENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to an outside expert or consultant who could reasonably

be anticipated to use that information in competition against the Producing Party without the prior

consent of the Producing Party.

VIII. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

1. Timing of Challenges. Any Party or non-party may challenge a confidentiality des-

ignation at any time. A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of a designation at the

time it is made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge.

2. Method of Challenge. A Party initiating a challenge to a confidentiality designation

shall do so in good faith by serving written notice on the Designating Party that identifies each chal-

lenged designation and describes the basis for each challenge with reasonable particularity. Within

seven (7) calendar days after receiving the written notice of challenge, the Designating Party and the

Challenging Party shall begin a good-faith meet-and-confer process, conducted in person or by tele-

phone, to attempt to resolve the dispute. Within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the written

notice of challenge, or within such other time as the Parties may agree in writing, the Designating

Party shall state in writing whether it is maintaining, modifying, or withdrawing each challenged des-

ignation and, if maintaining the designation, the basis for doing so. If the Parties cannot resolve a

challenge through the meet-and-confer process, the Challenging Party may seek relief from the Court

in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Civil Rule 37.2, and the Court’s Indi-

vidual Rules and Practices.

3. In any challenge proceeding, the Designating Party bears the burden of establishing

that the challenged material is properly designated under this Order and Federal Rule of Civil Proce-

dure 26(c). Unless and until the Designating Party withdraws or modifies the designation, or the Court

orders otherwise, all Parties and non-parties shall continue to treat the challenged material according

to the designation initially asserted.

4. Waiver. A challenge to a designation shall not waive any other objection to the dis-

covery at issue. Frivolous challenges, and designations made for an improper purpose or without a

good-faith basis, may subject the offending Party to appropriate relief or sanctions.

IX. USE AT DEPOSITIONS

1. Any witness who, in the good-faith belief of counsel for a Party, may be called to

testify at trial or deposition in this Action may be shown or examined on any information, document

or thing, irrespective of designation, if it appears that the witness authored or received a copy of it, or

is the Party or non-party, or is employed by the Party or non-party, who produced the information,

document or thing, or if the Producing Party consents in writing to such disclosure. Consent to dis-

closure shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall be given within three (3) business days of any

request for consent. The disclosure of Protected Material to any such witness may be made only in

connection with preparing that witness for a deposition or hearing, or during a deposition or hearing.

Prior to the disclosure of such Protected Material to any such witness, counsel for the Party making

the disclosure shall deliver a copy of this Order to such person, shall explain that such person is bound

by the terms of such Order, and shall secure the signature of such person on a copy of the “Acknowl-

edgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A).

2. For depositions, the Receiving Party shall not prepare more copies of materials desig-

nated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” than are reasonably necessary

for the deponent, his or her counsel, counsel for the Parties, and counsel of record expected to be in

attendance. At the conclusion of the deposition, one (1) paper copy of any such document marked as

a deposition exhibit may be retained by the Party who noticed the deposition as part of the official

deposition record. All other copies of such documents brought to the deposition shall be collected

and returned to the Producing Party or securely destroyed in a timely manner following the deposition.

3. The use of a document as a deposition exhibit does not alter its confidentiality desig-

nation. Any transcript pages, exhibits, or video segments that disclose Protected Material shall be

treated in accordance with this Order and any transcript-designation procedure set forth elsewhere in

this Order.

X. OUTSIDE COUNSEL AND EXPERTS

1. Any Outside Counsel or Expert who has been afforded access to information or items

from a Producing Party which has been designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFI-

DENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall not disclose, use or apply such information or

items for any purpose other than for work or services performed in the scope of this Action.

2. Outside Counsel shall take reasonable steps to ensure that any outside expert, consult-

ant, vendor, or service provider receiving Protected Material is given only the material reasonably

necessary for that person’s work in this Action and is bound by this Order.

3. Nothing in this Section alters any additional requirements applicable to disclosure of

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” material to outside experts or con-

sultants under Section VII.

XI. USE IN THIS ACTION

1. The status and designation of information or material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall not be lost or impaired by use

of such information or material in this Action or any appeal therefrom. Whenever any Protected

Material must be filed with the Court, Parties shall file and/or lodge those papers in a manner that is

consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, or any

local rules, as applicable.

2. Nothing in this Order authorizes any Party to file Protected Material under seal or in

redacted form merely because it has been designated under this Order. Any request to file material

under seal or in redacted form must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, the Local Rules

of the Southern District of New York, the S.D.N.Y. ECF Rules, and the Court’s Individual Rules and

Practices. Any such request must be narrowly tailored and supported by an adequate basis; the parties’

agreement or a confidentiality designation alone is insufficient.

3. Where Court approval is required, the filing Party shall publicly file the required letter-

motion, publicly file a redacted version where appropriate, and file under seal the unredacted version

with proposed redactions highlighted or otherwise in the manner required by the Court’s rules and

practices.

XII. NON-PARTIES

1. This Order applies to Discovery Material produced by non-parties in this Action. Any

non-party producing Discovery Material in this Action may designate material under this Order and

shall be entitled to the protections of this Order to the same extent as a Party. A copy of this Order

shall be furnished to any non-party from whom discovery is sought if that non-party requests it or if

a Party seeks to designate that non-party’s material under this Order.

XIII. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED

1. If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena, civil investigative demand, public-rec-

ords request, or court order issued in another proceeding that seeks material designated in this Action

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” the Re-

ceiving Party shall promptly, and in no event later than three (3) business days after receipt, notify the

Designating Party in writing and provide a copy of the subpoena, request, or order. The Receiving

Party shall also promptly notify the person or entity that caused the subpoena, request, or order to

issue that the requested material is subject to this Protective Order, and shall provide a copy of this

Order.

2. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert interested parties to the existence of

this Protective Order and to afford the Producing Party in this Action an opportunity to protect its

confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Producing Party

shall bear the burden of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material. Until that tribunal

rules, the Receiving Party shall not produce the designated material unless required by law or court

order.

3. The Receiving Party must inform the Producing Party of which data or documents, if

any, it plans to produce in response to a subpoena, civil investigative demand, public-records request,

or court order at least 10 days before any disclosure is made. The Receiving Party must also provide

a copy of the as-submitted response, together with any related cover letters or correspondence, to the

Producing Party on the same day that the response is provided.

XIV. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL

1. Except as otherwise provided in this Order or otherwise ordered by the Court, any

Party wishing to file any Protected Material must either (1) obtain written permission from the Pro-

ducing Party to file such material in the public record, or (2) move the Court for leave to file the

Protected Material under seal. Unless and until the Court has ruled on such a motion, a Receiving

Party may not file any Protected Material in the public record. Nothing herein shall preclude any Party

from filing a redacted version of such a pleading, brief, exhibit or other document in the public record

that omits the Protected Material.

2. A Party wishing to file Protected Material shall comply with this protective order and

the Court’s governing rules and practices. The filing Party need not obtain the Producing Party’s per-

mission before seeking leave to file the material in redacted or sealed form, but the filing Party shall

meet and confer first with the Designating Party or any affected non-party to determine whether

sealing, redaction, narrower redaction, or public filing is appropriate. Where the filing Party seeks

sealing or redaction based on another Party’s or a non-party’s confidentiality designation, the filing

Party shall provide notice sufficiently in advance to permit that Party or non-party to file any submis-

sion required by the Court’s rules in support of sealing or redaction.

XV. REDACTIONS

1. Pursuant to, and consistent with, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any Producing

Party may redact information from documents produced in discovery only to the extent the Producing

Party reasonably and in good faith believes the redacted information: (i) is protected by the attorney-

client privilege, work-product doctrine, joint-defense privilege, common-interest privilege, or another

recognized privilege or immunity; (ii) is information required to be redacted under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 5.2 or other applicable law; (iii) is irrelevant personally identifiable information, such

as Social Security numbers, taxpayer-identification numbers, financial-account numbers, dates of birth,

passport numbers, driver’s-license numbers, home addresses, personal telephone numbers not used

for work purposes, personal email addresses not used for work purposes, or the names of minor

children; or (iv) is irrelevant confidential third-party information, including non-party investor identi-

ties, limited-partner identities, bank-account information, or similarly sensitive third-party commercial

or personal information, where narrower protection is not reasonably practicable.

2. Redactions shall be narrowly tailored. A Producing Party may not redact information

merely because it is confidential or embarrassing if the information is otherwise relevant and discov-

erable. Each redaction shall be clearly labeled “REDACTED” or with a comparable legend, and the

Producing Party shall preserve an unredacted copy.

3. Any Party may challenge a redaction under the same procedures that govern challenges

to confidentiality designations. Pending resolution, the Producing Party shall, if requested, identify the

basis for the redaction at a level of detail that does not reveal the redacted information itself.

XVI. INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED MATERIALS

1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(b)(5)(B), the production or disclosure of privileged, work-product-protected, or otherwise pro-

tected information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection in

this Action or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the

maximum protection permitted by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). If a Producing Party discovers

that it has produced privileged or otherwise protected material, it should promptly notify the Receiving

Party in writing and identify the material by Bates number or other reasonably specific description.

Upon receipt of such notice, the Receiving Party shall promptly sequester, return, or destroy all copies

of the identified material and shall make no further use of it unless and until the claim is resolved.

2. If the Receiving Party contests the claim of privilege or protection, it shall notify the

Producing Party promptly in writing, shall continue to sequester the material, and may present the

material to the Court under seal for a determination of the claim. The Receiving Party shall not use or

disclose the material, or any information derived from it, unless and until the Court rules that the

material is not privileged or protected. Nothing in this Order limits a Party’s right to conduct a review

of documents, ESI, or information for relevance, responsiveness, segregation of privileged material,

or confidentiality before production.

XVII. INADVERTENT FAILURE TO DESIGNATE PROPERLY

1. The inadvertent failure by a Producing Party to designate Discovery Material as Pro-

tected Material does not waive the right to make a later designation if the Producing Party promptly

notifies the Receiving Parties after learning of the omission. After giving such notice, the Producing

Party shall reproduce or otherwise identify the material with the correct designation within a reasona-

ble time. Upon receipt of the corrected designation, each Receiving Party shall make reasonable efforts

to retrieve and destroy or relabel unmarked copies and shall thereafter treat the material in accordance

with the corrected designation.

2. A Receiving Party shall not be in breach of this Order for any disclosure or use made

before receiving notice of the corrected designation. To the extent material was disclosed before cor-

rection, the Receiving Party shall take reasonable steps to notify any unauthorized recipients of the

new designation and to secure compliance going forward.

XVIII. INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE NOT AUTHORIZED BY ORDER

1. If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it or a person to whom

it disclosed Protected Material has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance

not authorized by this Order, the Receiving Party shall immediately: (a) notify the Designating Party

in writing; (b) use best reasonable efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies; (c) inform the unauthor-

ized recipient of the terms of this Order; (d) request that the unauthorized recipient execute Exhibit

A; and (e) take reasonable steps to prevent further unauthorized use or disclosure. Within five (5)

business days of learning of the unauthorized disclosure, the Receiving Party shall provide the Desig-

nating Party with a written report identifying, to the extent known, the person or persons who received

the material, the circumstances of the disclosure, the material disclosed, and the corrective steps taken.

2. Unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure does not alter the confidentiality status of the

material or waive the Designating Party’s right to seek further relief.

XIX. EXPERT MATERIALS

1. All matters concerning expert discovery shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the Local Rules, and the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, except as expressly mod-

ified by this Order.

2. Consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4), the following need not be

disclosed and are outside the scope of discovery, except as otherwise required by Rule 26(b)(4)(C) or

other applicable law:

(a) A Consulting Expert’s communications, documents, or electronic information

made or prepared in connection with this Action including, but not limited to, communica-

tions sent to or received by counsel for the Party retaining the Consulting Expert(s);

(b) A Testifying Expert’s (i) drafts of expert reports, declarations, affidavits, opin-

ions, written testimony, or work papers prepared in connection with this Action or any other

action; (ii) preliminary or intermediate calculations, computations, modeling, or data runs pre-

pared in connection with this Action or any other action; or (iii) other preliminary expert opin-

ions or draft materials;

(c) Notes or summaries of a Testifying Expert, or persons working at the direction

of a Testifying Expert, prepared in connection with this Action or any other action;

(d) Any comments, whether oral or written, related to an expert report or affidavit

of a Testifying Expert prepared in connection with this Action by (i) counsel for a Party re-

taining the Testifying Expert, (ii) a Consulting Expert, or (iii) any person working at the Testi-

fying Expert’s direction; and

(e) Any communications, whether oral or written, between a Testifying Expert

and (i) counsel for a Party retaining the Testifying Expert, (ii) a Consulting Expert, or (iii) any

person working at the Testifying Expert’s direction, including any information and things in-

cluded in or attached to such communications, except to the extent they are directly relied

upon by the Testifying Expert in his or her expert report, declaration, affidavit, or testimony.

3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following are discoverable to the extent required

by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(C): communications relating to compensation for the

Testifying Expert’s study or testimony; communications identifying facts or data that counsel provided

and that the Testifying Expert considered in forming the opinions to be expressed; and communica-

tions identifying assumptions that counsel provided and that the Testifying Expert relied upon in

forming the opinions to be expressed. Nothing herein limits the disclosures required by Rule

26(a)(2)(B) or any Party’s right to challenge the admissibility or qualifications of any expert.

XX. FINAL DISPOSITION

1. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed in writing by the Designating Party,

within sixty (60) days after the Termination Date, each Receiving Party shall either return or destroy

all Protected Material, including all copies, excerpts, compilations, summaries, and other materials

embodying Protected Material.

2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel of record may retain: (a) one archival copy of

pleadings, motion papers, hearing or trial transcripts, deposition transcripts and exhibits, correspond-

ence, attorney work product, expert work product, and consultant work product, even if such materi-

als contain Protected Material; (b) documents filed on the Court’s docket; and (c) materials stored on

backup tapes, disaster-recovery systems, or other routine archival systems that are not reasonably ac-

cessible in the ordinary course, provided that such retained material remains subject to this Order and

is not accessed except as reasonably necessary for compliance, recordkeeping, or legal obligations. If

the Designating Party requests written confirmation, the Receiving Party shall provide a certification

that it has complied with this Section, except for materials permitted to be retained under this para-

graph.

XXI. MISCELLANEOUS

1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification, additional protection, or relief from the Court.

2. Termination of Matter and Retention of Jurisdiction. This Order survives the final

termination of this Action. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over all persons who have received

Protected Material for the limited purpose of enforcing this Order and addressing any violation of it.

3. Successors. This Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their attorneys, and

their successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, as-

signs, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, retained consultants and experts, and any persons or

organizations over which they have direct control.

4. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Or-

der, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to producing or disclosing any infor-

mation or item. This Order shall not constitute a waiver of the right of any Party to claim in this

Action or otherwise that any Discovery Material, or any portion thereof, is privileged or otherwise

non-discoverable, or is not admissible in evidence in this Action or any other proceeding. Stipulating

to entry of this Protective Order shall not prejudice in any way the rights of a Party to petition the

Court for a further protective order relating to any confidential information, nor prevent the Parties

from agreeing in writing or on the record during a deposition or hearing in this Action to alter or

waive the provisions or protections provided for herein with respect to any particular information or

material.

5. Modification by Court. This Court is responsible for the interpretation and enforce-

ment of this Order. All disputes concerning Protected Material, however designated, produced under

the protection of this Order shall be resolved by this Court as provided herein.

6. Bound by Order. All persons who have access to information or material designated

as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under

this Protective Order acknowledge that they are bound by this Order, and that they submit to the

jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of enforcing this Order.

7. Discovery Rules Remain Unchanged. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing

in this Order shall alter or change in any way the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, or any Court order entered in this

Action. Identification of any individual pursuant to this Protective Order does not make that individ-

ual available for deposition or any other form of discovery outside of the restrictions and procedures

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, or the

Court’s own orders entered in this Action.

Dated: May 5, 2026 Respectfully submitted,

[s/ Daniel M. Vitaghano (with permission) [s/ Mylan L. Denerstein

‘Thomas R. McCarthy** Mylan L. Denerstein

Cameron Norris** GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Daniel M. Vitaghano* (SDNY Bar No. 200 Park Avenue

5856703) New York, NY 10166-0193

CONSOVOY MCCarRTHY PLLC (212) 351-3850

1600 Wilson Blvd., Ste. 700 mdenerstein@gibsondunn.com

Arlington, VA 22209

tom@consovoymcecarthy.com Jason C. Schwartz (pro hac vice)

cam@consovoymcecarthy.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

dvitaghano@consovoymecarthy.com 1700 M Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036-4504

Patrick N. Strawbridge** (202) 955-8242

CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC jschwartz@gibsondunn.com

Ten Post Office Square

8th Floor South PMB #706 Gregg J. Costa (pro hac vice)

Boston, MA 02109 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

patrick@consovoymecarthy.com 811 Main Street, Suite 300

Houston, TX 77002-6117

*Supervised by principals of the firm admitted (346) 718-6649

to practice in VA gcosta@gibsondunn.com

Counsel for Andav Capital and Nisha Desai Attorneys for Defendants PayPal Holdings, Inc.

and PayPal Ventures

This stipulation binds the parties to treat as confidential the documents so classified. This Court, however, ha:

not reviewed the documents referenced herein; therefore, by so ordering this stipulation, the Court makes no

finding as to whether the documents are confidential. That finding will be made, if ever, upon a document-by

document review pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices and subjec

the presumption in favor of public access to “judicial documents.” See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of

Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To that end, the Court does not “so order” any provision to 1

extent that it purports to authorize the parties to file documents under seal without a prior court order. See Ne

York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp., No. 15-CV-6605 (JMF), 2019 WL 3294170 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2019

ay 6, 2026

EXHIBIT A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ANDAV CAPITAL,

NISHA DESAI,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Case No. 25-cv-33 (JMF)

PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC.,

PAYPAL VENTURES,

Defendants.

AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. My name is________________________________________________________

2. I have read the Protective Order that has been entered in this case, and a copy of it has been

given to me. I understand the provisions of the Protective Order and agree to comply with

and to be bound by its provisions. I also consent to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes

of enforcement of the Protective Order.

3. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this ___ day of _____________ by ___________________

(Print Name)

Signed____________________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.