Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
Jun 1, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

LUIS VENTO PEREZ CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:26-1638

SECTION P

VS.

JUDGE JERRY EDWARDS, JR.

U.S. DEPT. OF HOMELAND MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY

SECURITY, ET AL.

ORDER

Petitioner Luis Vento Perez,1 a detainee at Krome North Service Processing Center in the

custody of the Department of Homeland Security and the Bureau of Immigration and Customs

Enforcement who proceeds pro se, petitions the Court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. § 2241.

On May 19, 2026, the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida,

transferred the instant proceeding to this Court. [doc. # 6].

“‘To entertain a § 2241 habeas petition, the district court must, upon the filing of the

petition, have jurisdiction over the prisoner or his custodian.’” Williams v. United States, No.

20-10422, 2021 WL 5871878, at *1 (5th Cir. Dec. 10, 2021) (emphasis added) (quoting United

States v. Brown, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir. 1985)).2 “[W]hen the Government moves a habeas

petitioner after she properly files a petition naming her immediate custodian, the District Court

1 Petitioner’s “A-Number” is 077-012-742.

2 See McClure v. Hopper, 577 F.2d 938, 939-40 (5th Cir. 1978) (“When McClure filed his

petition, he was imprisoned within the Southern District. Jurisdiction attached upon the initial

filing for habeas corpus relief. It was not destroyed upon the transfer of petitioner and

accompanying custodial change.”).

retains jurisdiction and may direct the writ to any respondent within its jurisdiction who has legal

authority to effectuate the prisoner’s release.” Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 441 (2004).

Here, because Petitioner was not detained in this judicial district at the time of filing, this

Court lacks jurisdiction.3 When Petitioner filed this petition, he was detained at Florida Soft-

Side South Detention Center, which is “in the Middle District of Florida.” [doc. #s 1, p. 1; 6, p.

1].

The Court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to any district or division in

which it could have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (a court “shall, if it is in the interest of

justice, transfer such action or appeal to any other such court . . . in which the action or appeal

could have been brought at the time it was filed . . . .”).

3 See Zare v. U S Immigr. & Customs Enf't, No. 1:25-CV-01450, 2025 WL 2822495, at *1 (W.D.

La. Oct. 2, 2025); Smith v. Fleming, No. CIV.A.4:02-CV-440-Y, 2002 WL 31114021, at *2 (N.D.

Tex. Sept. 20, 2002) (“It is well established that jurisdiction over the petitioner attaches with the

initial filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the

accompanying custodial change.”); Mahamud v. Sessions, No. 17-21044-CIV, 2017 WL

11696778, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2017) (transferring to the Middle District of Florida, where

the petitioner was confined “at the time of filing”); Mesa Rodriguez by Next Friend Pinero v.

Krome N. Serv. Processing Ctr., No. 2:26-CV-648-JES-NPM, 2026 WL 840859, at *2 (M.D. Fla.

Mar. 26, 2026) (“If Mesa Rodriguez refiles his petition, he must file it in the District Court with

jurisdiction over the facility at which he is detained at the time of filing.”); Chirinos v. Immigr. &

Customs Enf't, No. 6:26-CV-00264-AGM-DCI, 2026 WL 327639, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2026)

(“The Court’s jurisdiction is fixed as of the date the petition is filed and if the petition adequately

names the immediate custodian, then subsequent moving of the petitioner does not defeat the

court’s habeas jurisdiction.”); Palma v. Powell, No. 7:26-CV-299-EGL-SGC, 2026 WL 701778,

at *1 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 12, 2026) (“Jurisdiction depends on the petitioner’s location at the time of

filing.”); Winene v. Custodian, Baker Cnty. Det. Ctr., No. 17-CIV-20841, 2017 WL 11697552, at

*1 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 25, 2017), report and recommendation adopted sub nom. Winene v. Sessions,

No. 17-20841-CIV, 2017 WL 11697550 (S.D. Fla. May 25, 2017).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this proceeding is TRANSFERRED to the United

States District Court, Middle District of Florida.

In Chambers, Monroe, Louisiana, this 1 day of June, 2026.

Kayla Dye McClusky

United States Magistrate Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.