Opinion

Tran

Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
May 18, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

DUNG TRAN

Petitioners,

v. Case No. 2:26-cv-593-JES-NPM

WARDEN, FLORIDA SOFT SIDE

SOUTH, et al.,

Respondents.

/

OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner Dung Tran initiated this action by filing a

petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc.

1). At the Court’s direction, the government filed a response to

the petition, arguing among other things, that Tran’s detention

was lawful as he had not yet been detained in excess of 180 days

when he filed his petition. (Doc. 3 at 3–7). On May 13, 2026,

the Court directed the government to file supplemental briefing

because, by then, Tran had been detained for 182 days. (Doc. 8).

On May 14, 2026, the government informed the Court that

“Federal Respondents are unable to establish a significant

likelihood of [Tran’s] removal in the reasonably foreseeable

future. Further, Federal Respondents do not oppose his release

under appropriate conditions of supervision to be determined by

ICE.” (Doc. 9). Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in this

Order, Tran’s petition is granted.

I. Background

Tran is a native and citizen of Vietnam who was ordered

removed from the United States on August 12, 1998. (Doc. 3 at 1).

Tran’s appeal of the removal order to the Board of Immigration

Appeals was dismissed on March 16, 1999. (Id.) At some point,

Tran was released from immigration custody under an order of

supervision, but he was re-detained on November 12, 2025. (Id.)

1

II. Discussion

“Once a noncitizen’s order of removal becomes

administratively final, the Government ‘shall’ remove the person

within 90 days.” Singh v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 945 F.3d 1310, 1313

(11th Cir. 2019) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(1)(A)).

In Zadvydas v. Davis, the Supreme Court held that “if removal

is not reasonably foreseeable, the court should hold continued

detention unreasonable and no longer authorized by statute.” 533

U.S. 680, 700-01 (2001). So, “for the sake of uniform

administration in the federal courts,” Zadvydas established a

“presumptively reasonable period of detention” of six months—the

90-day removal period plus an additional 90 days. Id. at 701.

1

In their first response, Respondents argued that the Court

lacks jurisdiction to consider this petition. (Doc. 3 at 4). The

Court rejected identical jurisdiction arguments in Omar Mauso

Lasso v. South Florida Detention Facility, No. 2:26-cv-918-JES-

NPM, 2026 WL 1251678 (M.D. Fla. May 7, 2026) and Jerez Castillo v.

Noem, No. 2:26-cv-550-JES-DNF, 2026 WL 1145792 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 28,

2026). The Court’s reasoning in those cases also applies here.

If, after 180 days, the noncitizen provides “good reason to believe

that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the

reasonably foreseeable future,” the government must provide

sufficient evidence to show otherwise. Id.

Respondents agree that Tran has been in immigration custody

for more than 180 days and that his removal is unlikely to occur

in the reasonably foreseeable future. (Doc. 9). Thus, he is

entitled to release from detention, but he remains subject to the

terms of an order of supervision. If Tran fails to comply with

the conditions of release, he may be subject to criminal penalties—

including further detention. See 8 U.S.C. § 1253(b); Zadvydas,

533 U.S. at 695(“[W]e nowhere deny the right of Congress ... to

subject [aliens] to supervision with conditions when released from

detention, or to incarcerate them where appropriate for violations

of those conditions”).

If removal becomes likely in the reasonably foreseeable

future, ICE can re-detain Tran to “assur[e] [his] presence at the

moment of removal.” Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 680.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Dung Tran’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1)

is GRANTED.

2. Respondents shall release Tran within 24 hours of this

Order, and they shall facilitate his transportation from the

detention facility by allowing him telephone access to notify

counsel and his family of when and where he can be collected.

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions

and deadlines, enter judgment, and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 18, 2026.

J 1 E. STEELE

SHRWIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.