Opinion

Opinion

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.4%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 GIOVANNI CENTENO SOZA, Case No. 1:26-cv-00737-KES-SAB-HC

8 Petitioner, ORDER RE: NEXT FRIEND HABEAS

JURISDICTION

9 v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

10 WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA CITY TO UPDATE PETITIONER’S ADDRESS,

DETENTION FACILITY, MAIL PETITIONER GIOVANNI CENTENO

11 SOZA COPY OF PETITION AND THIS

Respondent. ORDER, AND MAIL EFRAIN ENRIQUE

12 CENTENO SOZA A COPY OF THIS

ORDER

13

14 On January 22, 2028, the instant federal habeas petition was filed in the United States

15 District Court for the Central District of California. (ECF No. 1.) As the petition challenges the

16 detention of Giovanni Centeno Soza (“Petitioner”) at the California City Detention Facility,

17 which is located in the Eastern District of California, the petition was transferred to this Court.

18 (ECF No. 5.)

19 The petition submitted to the Court was completed and signed by Petitioner’s brother,

20 Efrain Enrique Centeno Soza (“Mr. Centeno Soza”). (ECF No. 1 at 1.1) “‘[N]ext friends’ appear

21 in court on behalf of detained prisoners who are unable, usually because of mental incompetence

22 or inaccessibility, to seek relief themselves.” Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 162 (1990)

23 (citing United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11, 13, n.3 (1955)). However, “‘next

24 friend’ standing is by no means granted automatically to whomever seeks to pursue an action on

25 behalf of another.” Whitmore, 495 U.S. at 163. In order to establish standing, the next friend

26 must: (1) “provide an adequate explanation—such as inaccessibility, mental incompetence, or

27 other disability—why the real party in interest cannot appear on his own behalf to prosecute the

1 action”; and (2) “be truly dedicated to the best interests of the person on whose behalf he seeks to

2 litigate.” Whitmore, 495 U.S. at 163 (internal citations omitted). “The burden is on the ‘next

3 friend’ clearly to establish the propriety of his status and thereby justify the jurisdiction of the

4 court.” Id. at 164.

5 “Although the federal habeas corpus statute permits a ‘next friend’ to pursue a habeas

6 action on behalf of another in certain circumstances, see 28 U.S.C. § 2246, the statute does not

7 authorize the ‘next friend’ to proceed without an attorney.” United States v. Caputo, No. 1:14-cr-

8 00041-JLT-SKO-1, 2023 WL 5207318, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2023). See Hinojosa v.

9 Warden, SATF/SP, No. 2:22-cv-1780 DB P, 2023 WL 2874169, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2023)

10 (“[E]ven if Mr. Bland’s motion for ‘next friend’ status were granted, he would have to be

11 represented by counsel in order to proceed as a ‘next friend’ because pro se litigants have no

12 authority to represent anyone other than themselves.”), report and recommendation adopted,

13 2023 WL 4711303 (E.D. Cal. July 24, 2023). Additionally, the Local Rules of Practice for the

14 United States District Court, Eastern District of California provide in pertinent part:

15 Any individual who is representing himself or herself without an attorney must

appear personally or by courtesy appearance by an attorney admitted to the Bar of

16 this Court and may not delegate that duty to any other individual, including

husband or wife, or any other party on the same side appearing without an

17 attorney. Any individual representing himself or herself without an attorney is

bound by the Federal Rules of Civil or Criminal Procedure, these Rules, and all

18 other applicable law. All obligations placed on “counsel” by these Rules apply to

individuals appearing in propria persona. Failure to comply therewith may be

19 ground for dismissal, judgment by default, or any other sanction appropriate

under these Rules. A corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney.

20

21 L.R. 183(a). “Thus, in an action in which the sole plaintiff is incapacitated and cannot proceed

22 pro se, the plaintiff must be represented by competent counsel, or alternatively, the action must

23 be dismissed without prejudice.” Complot v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, No. CV-23-02348-PHX-

24 DWL, 2023 WL 8234271, at *3 (D. Ariz. Nov. 28, 2023) (citing Johns v. Cnty. of San Diego,

25 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997)).

26 Assuming that Mr. Centeno Soza qualifies for next-friend status, which would permit him

27 to initiate the instant petition on behalf of brother, it does not allow Mr. Centeno Soza to

1 | secure licensed counsel to proceed, or (2) Petitioner Giovanni Centeno Soza must notify the

2 | Court in writing that he will appear on his own behalf to prosecute this habeas action.

3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4 1. Within THIRTY (30) days from the date of service of this order, either:

5 (a) Petitioner Giovanni Centeno Soza should notify the Court in writing that: (a) his

6 brother filed the instant federal habeas petition with his knowledge and permission,

7 (b) he declares under penalty of perjury that the contents of the petition are true and

8 correct, and (c) going forward he will appear on his own behalf to prosecute this

9 habeas action; OR

10 (b) Mr. Efrain Enrique Centeno Soza should secure licensed counsel to proceed” and

11 said counsel shall file a notice of appearance in this matter;

12 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to:

13 a. Update Petitioner’s address to:

14 California City Detention Facility

22844 Virginia Boulevard

15 California City, CA 93505

16 b. Send Petitioner Giovanni Centeno Soza a copy of the petition (ECF No. 1) along

17 with a copy of this order; and

18 c. Send Mr. Efrain Enrique Centeno Soza a copy of this order at the address listed

19 on page 4 of the petition (ECF No. | at 4).

20 3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure

21 to comply with a Court order.

22

73 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf Se

24 | Dated: _ January 29, 2026 _ OO

STANLEY A. BOONE

25 United States Magistrate Judge

26

27 |

2 Mr. Efrain Enrique Centeno Soza may contact the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of

28 | California for assistance.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.