Opinion

McCloud v. Lorain Cty. Corr. Inst.

  • 2026 Ohio 2231
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

[Cite as McCloud v. Lorain Cty. Corr. Inst., 2026-Ohio-2231.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

)ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COUNTY OF LORAIN )

ANTONIO CHEETAH MCCLOUD

Petitioner C.A. No. 26CA000102

v.

WARDEN, LORAIN CORRECTIONAL ORIGINAL ACTION IN

INSTITUTION HABEAS CORPUS

Respondent

Dated: June 15, 2026

PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Antonio Cheetah McCloud, an inmate in the Richland Correctional Institution,

filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to order the warden of the Lorain Correctional

Institution to release him from custody. Because R.C. 2725.03 provides that jurisdiction is proper

only in the county in which the petitioner is incarcerated, this Court dismisses this case.

{¶2} Section 3(B)(1), Article IV, of the Ohio Constitution grants appellate courts

original jurisdiction over the writ of habeas corpus. This Court’s jurisdiction, however,

is limited by R.C. 2725.03. That section provides that if a person is incarcerated in a state

correctional institution, only the courts or judges of “the county in which the institution

is located has jurisdiction to issue or determine a writ of habeas corpus for his production

or discharge.”

{¶3} Mr. McCloud is incarcerated in a state correctional institution in Richland

County. Thus, pursuant to R.C. 2725.03, only the courts or judges of Richland County

2

have jurisdiction over his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. State ex rel. Robinson v.

Fender, 2022-Ohio-3701, ¶ 5. When a petition is filed in the wrong county, dismissal is

appropriate. Id. at ¶ 5-6; Brown v. Hall, 123 Ohio St.3d 381, 2009-Ohio-5592, ¶ 1.

Pursuant to R.C. 2725.03, therefore, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the petition.

{¶4} Because jurisdiction does not lie in this Court to consider Mr. McCloud’s

petition, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. McCloud.

{¶5} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58.

JILL FLAGG LANZINGER

FOR THE COURT

HENSAL, J.

SUTTON, J.

CONCUR.

APPEARANCES:

ANTONIO CHEETAH MCCLOUD, Pro se, Petitioner.

D. ANDREW WILSON, Ohio Attorney General, for Respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.