The opinion
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appeal of - )
)
Tatitlek Construction Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63863
)
Under Contract No. W912BV-17-C-0012 )
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael Hassett, Esq.
Michael Jackson, Esq.
Harrison Steck, P.C.
Fort Worth, TX
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.
Engineer Chief Trial Attorney
Matthew R. Watson, Esq.
Thomas E. Rogers, V, Esq.
Engineer Trial Attorneys
U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa
OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE HAMADY
The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter
judgment in favor of appellant.
It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the
parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a
consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of
$800,000. Interest shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from
May 21, 2026, until date of payment.
Dated: March 11, 2026
ROBYN L. HAMADY
Administrative Judge
Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals
(Signatures continued)
I concur I concur
J. REID PROUTY MICHAEL N. O'CONNELL
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge
Acting Chairman Vice Chairman
Armed Services Board Armed Services Board
of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63863, Appeal of Tatitlek
Construction Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.
Dated: March 12, 2026
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS
Recorder, Armed Services
Board of Contract Appeals
2