The opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 5D2025-3682
LT Case No. 2005-CF-001831-A
_____________________________
NATHANIEL BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Nathaniel Brown, Raiford, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
January 23, 2026
PER CURIAM.
This court previously entered an order denying what
amounted to Nathaniel Brown’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Due to Brown’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his
repetitive and frivolous pro se filings attacking his conviction and
sentence entered in 2005 in Duval County Circuit Court case
number 16-2005-CF-001831-A, 1 we issued an order dated
December 11, 2025, directing Brown to show cause why he should
not be barred from filing in this court any appeal, petition,
pleading, or motion pertaining to his conviction and sentence
rendered in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2005-CF-
001831-A unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to
practice law in the State of Florida.
Having carefully considered Brown’s response and finding
that it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed,
we conclude that Brown is abusing the judicial process and should
be barred from further pro se filings in this case. Therefore, in
order to conserve judicial resources, Nathaniel Brown is prohibited
from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning
Duval County Circuit Court Case No. 16-2005-CF-001831-A. The
Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se
filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily
reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed
by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v.
State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is
enough.”).
PETITIONER, NATHANIEL BROWN, PROHIBITED
FROM FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS.
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
1 See Brown v. Bondi, 240 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018);
Brown v. State, 35 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
2