Opinion

Swanson v. Brown County Sheriff Dept

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Oct 1, 2025
Status
Unpublished
Nature of suit
Civil Rights
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Case: 24-11052 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2025

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

____________

United States Court of Appeals

No. 24-11052 Fifth Circuit

Summary Calendar FILED

____________ October 1, 2025

Lyle W. Cayce

Susan Swanson, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Brown County Sheriff Department;

Brownwood Police Department;

Brown County of Court at Law;

Brown County Appraisal District; Brookesmith SUD;

City of Brownwood, Texas; Brownwood Public Library;

Brownwood Area Chamber of Commerce;

Steven Haynes, Attorney; Mark Bessent, Attorney;

Christoper Mitchell, Attorney; Sam Moss, Judge,

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:24-CV-47

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

_____________________

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 24-11052 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/01/2025

No. 24-11052

The plaintiff, pro se, sued numerous public and private parties per

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Her complaint is replete with rambling incoherence. She

claims collusion among, inter alia, attorneys, the mayor, and a judge by means

such as cyberwarfare and computer crimes. At one point in her brief, she

claims “the theft of assets totaling approximately 500,000,000.00 dollars’

worth of digital assets, slander and pornographic videos published on the

world wide web, and television, totaling into the thousands, and continuing

accumulations to this day.”

The district properly dismissed with prejudice, finding that the “law-

suit is brought for the purpose of harassing the defendants. It is a malicious

lawsuit premised upon claims which are frivolous and without merit [and] is

abusive of the civil justice system.”

Plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous. The judgment of dismissal is

AFFIRMED.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.