“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.”
How later courts described this case
- “Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DARRYL LESLIE FITZHUGH, )
Plaintiff,
V. Case No. CIV-25-326-R
GOOGLE TRUST SERVICES, LLC., et al.,
Defendants. □
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider [Doc. No. 21]. This is
Plaintiff's second motion seeking reconsideration of the Court’s order and judgment [Doc.
Nos. 17, 18] dismissing this action without prejudice. Once again, Plaintiff's motion does
not identify any grounds that would warrant reconsideration of the prior order. See Servants
of Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000) (“Grounds warranting a motion
to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in the controlling law, (2) new evidence
previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest
injustice.”) (citations omitted).
Accordingly, Plaintiff's second Motion to Reconsider is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8" day of September, 2025.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE