The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DARRYL LESLIE FITZHUGH, )
Plaintiff,
V. Case No. CIV-25-326-R
GOOGLE TRUST SERVICES, LLC., et al.,
Defendants. □
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider [Doc. No. 19] which, liberally
construed, appears to be seeking reconsideration of the Court’s prior order and judgment
dismissing this action without prejudice for failing to complete timely service.
“Grounds warranting a motion to reconsider include (1) an intervening change in
the controlling law, (2) new evidence previously unavailable, and (3) the need to correct
clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Servants of Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005,
1012 (10th Cir. 2000)) (citations omitted). Plaintiff's motion does not identify any
intervening change in the law, previously unavailable evidence, or clear error that would
warrant reconsideration.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22"! day of August, 2025.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE