Opinion

Brown v. Muzyka

Court
District Court, W.D. Texas
Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.3%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

WACO DIVISION

TYLER BROWN, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL NO. W-23-CV-00474-ADA

§

NIKOLAY MUZYKA, ALEKSEI DUL- §

PHEIN, AMLOAD, LLC, §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Derek T. Gilliland. ECF No. 79. The report recommends Defendants Nikolay Muzyka, Aleksei

Dulepin, and Amload LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) be

GRANTED. The report and recommendation was filed on June 26, 2025.

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of

the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). A district court need not consider “[f]rivolous, conclusive, or

general objections.” Battle v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting

Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), overruled on other

grounds by Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Plaintiff Tyler Brown filed objections on July 10, 2025, to which Defendants Muzyka

and Amload, LLC filed a response in opposition. ECF Nos. 83, 88. The Court has conducted a de

novo review of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the subsequent briefing, the report

and recommendation, the objection to the report and recommendation and the response thereto,

and the applicable laws. After that thorough review, the Court is persuaded that the Magistrate

Judge’s findings and recommendation should be adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland (ECF No. 79) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tyler Brown’s objections are

OVERRULED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with the Report and

Recommendation, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) is

GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ (1) vicarious liability, gross negligence, and direct negligence claims

against Defendant Dulepin, (11) gross negligence and direct negligence claims against Defendant

Amload, and (111) negligence per se claim against Defendant Muzyka.

SIGNED this 25th day of July, 2025.

(On. ‘

Ovo

ALAN D ALBRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.