“[A]s required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing 25 with claims of governmental privilege.’”
How later courts described this case
- “[A]s required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing 25 with claims of governmental privilege.’”
- providing that the exhaustion question should be decided as early as feasible
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 JULIAN J. ALEXANDER, Case No. 1:24-cv-01341-KES-EPG (PC)
8 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER
9 Exhaustion Motions: September 29, 2025
10 v.
Doe Identification: January 2, 2026
11
12 FOSTER, et al., Motions to Compel: February 3, 2026
13
Defendants. Non-expert Discovery: March 3, 2026
14
15 Dispositive Motions: April 3, 2026
16
17
This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions.
18
I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES
19
Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests.
20
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as
21
follows:
22
1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties:
23
a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for
24
information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under
25
Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2));
26 b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a written request that the
27 opposing party produce documents or electronically stored information,
28
1 “including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound
2 recordings, images, and other data or data compilations,” or a written request
3 that the opposing party produce any designated tangible things. Fed. R. Civ.
4 P. 34(a)(1));
c. Requests for Admissions (a request for admission is a written request that
5
the opposing party “admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth
6
of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1)” that relate to “(A) facts,
7
the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; [or] (B) the
8
genuineness of any described documents.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(1)); and
9
d. Depositions (a deposition is where one party (or that party’s counsel)
10
questions someone under oath, and a court reporter is present to record
11
the proceedings).
12
1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B),
13
Defendant(s) may depose any witness confined in a prison on
14
the condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a
15
deposition, Defendant(s) serve all parties with the notice required
16 by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to
17 participate in a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions
18 against Plaintiff, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of
19 this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4),
20 the parties may take any deposition under this section by video
21 conference without a further motion or order of the Court, relieving
22 the court reporter of the requirement to be in the physical presence
23 of the witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28(a)(1)
during that deposition.
24
2. If Plaintiff wishes to take a deposition, Plaintiff must file a motion
25
requesting the Court’s permission to do so. Before filing a motion,
26
Plaintiff must contract with a licensed court reporter, also known as
27
Certified Shorthand Reporters (CSRs). CSRs are not court
28
1 employees; they are private individuals. Plaintiff is responsible for
2 paying CSRs their fees for taking the deposition and producing
3 a transcript. Plaintiff’s pro se or in forma pauperis status does not
4 entitle Plaintiff to a free deposition. Every motion for leave to take
deposition must include the name of the person to be deposed,
5
the name and contact information for the court reporter with whom
6
Plaintiff contracted, the estimated cost for the CSR’s time and the
7
recording, and the source of funds for payment of that cost, or the
8
motion may be summarily denied for failure to comply with this
9
order. The Court may request input from Plaintiff’s institution of
10
confinement to determine if the deposition(s) can proceed in a safe
11
and secure manner before ruling on a motion for a deposition.
12
2. A party may serve on any other party no more than 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for
13
production of documents, and 15 requests for admission. If a party wishes to serve
14
additional discovery requests, that party may file a motion for additional discovery
15
requests with the Court, explaining why additional discovery requests are necessary.
16 3. Discovery requests and responses should be sent to the opposing part(ies), or their
17 counsel if represented. They should not be filed with the Court.
18 4. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the
19 request is first served. This means that written discovery requests must be served
20 within a timeframe that allows the opposing party a forty-five (45) day period to
21 respond prior to the close of non-expert discovery. Any party who is served a request
22 where the forty-five (45) day period for response would end after the close of non-
23 expert discovery is entitled to object to that request on the ground that the request is
untimely.
24
5. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily overruled by the Court.
25
Responses to document requests shall include all documents within a party’s
26
possession, custody, or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents are deemed to be
27
within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual possession,
28
1 custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on demand. If
2 Defendant(s) cannot obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement,
3 Defendant(s) shall clearly respond that a third-party subpoena will be necessary to
4 obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement.
6. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or
5
third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date,
6
author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty days
7
after the date that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within this time
8
shall result in a waiver of the privilege. Additionally, if a party is claiming a right to
9
withhold witness statements and/or evidence gathered from investigation(s) into the
10
incident(s) at issue in the complaint based on the official information privilege or
11
confidentiality, the withholding party shall submit the withheld witness statements
12
and/or evidence to the Court for in camera review, along with an explanation of why
13
the witness statements and/or evidence should be withheld.1 The witness statements
14
and/or evidence shall be Bates stamped and emailed to
15
EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The withholding party shall also file and serve a
16
17
1 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94–95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality of
18
those prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of an
19 administrative record that is helpful to the court. When a grievance is filed shortly after the event giving
rise to the grievance, witnesses can be identified and questioned while memories are still fresh, and
20 evidence can be gathered and preserved.”).
The “common law governmental privilege (encompassing and referred to sometimes as the official
21
or state secret privilege) . . . is only a qualified privilege, contingent upon the competing interests of the
22 requesting litigant and subject to disclosure. . . .” Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 511 F.2d 192,
198 (9th Cir. 1975) (citations omitted). The Ninth Circuit has since followed Kerr in requiring in camera
23 review and a balancing of interests in ruling on the government’s claim of the official information
24 privilege. See, e.g., Breed v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 542 F.2d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 1976) (“[A]s
required by Kerr, we recognize ‘that in camera review is a highly appropriate and useful means of dealing
25 with claims of governmental privilege.’”) (quoting Kerr v. U. S. Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of Cal., 426 U.S.
394, 406 (1976)); Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana, 936 F.2d 1027, 1033–34 (9th Cir. 1990), as amended on
26
denial of reh’g (Feb. 27, 1991), as amended on denial of reh’g (May 24, 1991) (“Government personnel
27 files are considered official information. To determine whether the information sought is privileged, courts
must weigh the potential benefits of disclosure against the potential disadvantages. If the latter is greater,
28 the privilege bars discovery.”) (citations omitted).
1 notice that they have complied with this order. All other claims of privilege may be
2 challenged via a motion to compel.
3 7. If Plaintiff seeks documents from someone who is not a party in this case, Plaintiff
4 must file a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum with the Court. In any
request for a subpoena, Plaintiff must: (1) identify the documents sought and from
5
whom; (2) explain why the documents are relevant to the claims in this case; and
6
(3) make a showing in the request that the records are only obtainable through a third
7
party. If the Court approves the request, it may issue Plaintiff a subpoena duces tecum,
8
commanding the production of documents from a non-party, and may command
9
service of the subpoena by the United States Marshals Service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45; 28
10
U.S.C. § 1915(d). However, the Court will consider granting such a request only if the
11
documents sought from the non-party are not obtainable from Defendant(s) through a
12
Rule 34 request for production of documents.
13
8. The parties are required to act in good faith during the course of discovery and the
14
failure to do so may result in the payment of expenses pursuant to Federal Rule of
15
Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) or other appropriate sanctions authorized by the Federal
16 Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.
17 9. The parties have until February 3, 2026, to file motion(s) to compel further discovery
18 responses. Motions to compel can be used to challenge failure of a party to respond to
19 a discovery request, failure to produce documents on the basis of privilege, or failure
20 to produce privilege log. The motion(s) should include a copy of the request(s) and
21 any response to the request(s) at issue.
22 10. The Court will not require an informal discovery dispute conference prior to the filing
23 of any discovery motion. Nor are the parties required to follow the procedures set forth
in Local Rule 251 for dealing with discovery motions, including the preparation of a
24
joint discovery statement. Instead, the parties shall follow the briefing schedule
25
provided by Local Rule 230(l) for any discovery motion brought pursuant to Federal
26
Rules of Civil Procedure 26–37 and 45.
27
28
1 11. The parties are advised that each party is responsible for planning and timing their
2 own discovery. This means that the Court will not sua sponte extend the deadline for
3 any party to file motions to compel or to respond and/or serve written discovery
4 requests.
II. DOE IDENTIFICATION
5
As noted in this Court’s order authorizing service of the complaint, the Court has found
6
cognizable claims against Lieutenant John Doe and will permit Plaintiff the opportunity to
7
discover information to be able to identify this Defendant. (ECF No. 9, p. 4). Plaintiff may submit
8
discovery requests to Defendant(s) in order to identify Lieutenant John Doe. The Court notes that
9
Defendants’ statement says that they “do not believe a third-party subpoena to Plaintiff’s
10
institution of confinement will be necessary to obtain relevant documents.” (ECF No. 26, p. 5).
11
However, Plaintiff may request a subpoena duces tecum if information regarding Lieutenant John
12
Doe is not available from Defendant(s).
13
Plaintiff has until January 2, 2026, to file a motion to substitute a named individual in
14
place of Lieutenant John Doe. If Plaintiff fails to identify Lieutenant John Doe by this deadline,
15
Lieutenant John Doe may be dismissed from the case.
16 III. PAGE LIMITS, COURTESY COPIES, AND REQUIREMENT TO RESPOND
17 The parties are advised that unless prior leave of the Court is obtained before the filing
18 deadline,2 all moving and opposition briefs or legal memoranda shall not exceed twenty-five (25)
19 pages. Reply briefs by the moving party shall not exceed ten (10) pages. These page limits do not
20 include exhibits. The parties shall not file multiple or supplemental briefs to circumvent this rule.
21 Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, motions
22 concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55,
23
56, 59 and 60, and Local Rule 110, shall be briefed pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).3 Failure to
timely oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. Local Rule
24
230(l). Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not
25
26
27
2 Parties may seek leave by filing a short motion.
28 3 As noted below, the deadline to file oppositions is different for dispositive motions.
1 signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. Opposition to all other motions need
2 be filed only as directed by the court.
3 Pursuant to Local Rule 133(j), depositions should not be filed. However, counsel
4 referencing a deposition in any filing must submit pertinent portions of the deposition as
exhibit(s). In addition, counsel should also email a copy of the entire deposition as a .pdf file to
5
EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov “and concurrently email or otherwise transmit the deposition to all
6
other parties.” L.R. 133(j). Counsel should not email links to file sharing services that require the
7
Court to download the deposition.
8
IV. NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE
9
The deadline for the completion of all non-expert discovery is March 3, 2026. As
10
discussed above, this deadline includes all written discovery requests and responses. Any written
11
discovery request must be made so that the opposing party is allowed the entire amount of time
12
allotted for response by this deadline.
13
V. EXHAUSTION MOTION DEADLINE
14
The deadline for Defendant(s) to present any challenge for failure to exhaust
15 administrative remedies is September 29, 2025.4 Failure to raise the exhaustion defense by this
16 deadline will result in waiver of the defense. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir.
17 2014) (providing that the exhaustion question should be decided as early as feasible).
18 VI. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE
19 The deadline for filing dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment
20 (other than dispositive motions based on the defense of failure to exhaust administrative
21 remedies), is April 3, 2026. The deadline to file oppositions to dispositive motions, including
22 motions for summary judgment, is thirty days from the date the motion is filed. The deadline to
23 file replies to oppositions is fourteen days from the date the opposition is filed. If a party needs
an extension of any of these deadlines, that party may file a motion for an extension of time.
24
If Defendant(s) file a motion for summary judgment, Defendant(s) shall simultaneously
25
provide Plaintiff with the notice and warning required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th
26
27 4 If Defendant(s) need an extension of this deadline, Defendant(s) shall file a motion requesting an
28 extension of this deadline.
1 Cir. 1998). In addition to the language suggested by Rand in Appendix A of that opinion, id. at
2 962, this notice must also include a short and plain statement of the Local Rule 260 requirements
3 and be titled “This Notice is Required to be Given to you by the Court.”
4 The parties are also advised of the following requirements regarding motions for summary
judgment contained in the Local Rules:
5
(a) Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication. Each
6
motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall be
7 accompanied by a “Statement of Undisputed Facts” that shall enumerate
discretely each of the specific material facts relied upon in support of the
8 motion and cite the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit,
deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon
9 to establish that fact. The moving party shall be responsible for the filing of
all evidentiary documents cited in the moving papers. See L.R. 133(j).
10
(b) Opposition. Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or
11 summary adjudication shall reproduce the itemized facts in the Statement
of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny
12
those that are disputed, including with each denial a citation to the
13 particular portions of any pleading, affidavit, deposition, interrogatory
answer, admission, or other document relied upon in support of that denial.
14 The opposing party may also file a concise “Statement of Disputed Facts,”
and the source thereof in the record, of all additional material facts as to
15 which there is a genuine issue precluding summary judgment or
adjudication. The opposing party shall be responsible for the filing of all
16
evidentiary documents cited in the opposing papers. See L.R. 133(j). If a
17 need for discovery is asserted as a basis for denial of the motion, the party
opposing the motion shall provide a specification of the particular facts on
18 which discovery is to be had or the issues on which discovery is necessary.
19 Local Rule 260(a)–(b).
20 If Defendant(s) file a motion for summary judgment, the accompanying Statement of
Undisputed facts shall contain an additional blank column titled “Plaintiff’s Response and
21
Supporting Evidence,” which Plaintiff may use to respond to each fact. Here is an example of a
22
format Defendant(s) may follow:
23
24 Number Undisputed Material Fact Supporting Plaintiff’s Response and
Evidence Supporting Evidence
25
On X date, Plaintiff was confined X Decl. ¶ 20.
1.
26 at X institution.
27
28
1 2. The X incident alleged in the X interrogatory
complaint happened on X date. response.
2
3. Plaintiff saw Dr. Y on X date. Y Decl. ¶ 45.
3
4 Plaintiff may use Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts to comply with requirements
5 of Local Rule 260(b), which requires the responding party to “reproduce the itemized facts in the
6 Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are undisputed and deny those that are
7 disputed, including with each denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading, affidavit,
8 deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other document relied upon in support of that
9 denial.” For example, Plaintiff may complete it as follows:
10 Number Undisputed Material Fact Supporting Plaintiff’s Response and
Evidence Supporting Evidence
11
On X date, Plaintiff was confined X Decl. ¶ 20. Admitted.
1.
12 at X institution.
13 2. The X incident alleged in the X interrogatory Denied. Pl. deposition
complaint happened on X date. response. at 2:4–6.
14
3. Plaintiff saw Dr. Y on X date. Y Decl. ¶ 45. Admitted.
15
16 VII. FURTHER DATES AND DEADLINES
If this case is still proceeding after dispositive motions have been resolved, or if no
17
dispositive motions are filed, the Court will set expert disclosure deadlines,5 a pretrial conference,
18
pretrial deadlines, and a trial date.
19
Additionally, within fourteen days after a final ruling on any dispositive motion, if the
20
case proceeds, Defendant(s) shall confer with Plaintiff and file a report indicating each party’s
21
position on whether a settlement conference would be productive.
22
VIII. EFFECT OF THIS ORDER
23
This order represents the Court’s best estimated schedule through dispositive motions.
24
Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an
25
appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).
26
5 While the Court is not setting a deadline for expert disclosures at this time, the parties may
27 provide their expert disclosures at any time. Such disclosures must conform with Federal Rule of Civil
28 Procedure 26(a)(2)(B)-(C).
1 The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent
2 | ashowing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
3 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
4
; IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _ July 7, 2025 [spe ey
7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10