Opinion

United States v. Marlo Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Oct 25, 2013
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARLO BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlo Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, Charles Joseph

Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Barbara

Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marlo Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on Brown’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Brown, No.

1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1 (D. Md. June 25, 2013). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.