Opinion

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 6, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 33.2%

voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 8 | 41(a)(1) is self-executing and requires no further action by court

How later courts described this case

  • voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 8 | 41(a)(1) is self-executing and requires no further action by court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

1 SABA BIREDA (pro hac vice) MICHELE HAYDEL GEHRKE (#215647)

JAMES HANNAWAY (pro hac vice) Reed Smith LLP

2 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800

700 Pennsylvania Avenue S.E., Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94105

3 Washington, DC 20003 Telephone: (415) 543-8700

Telephone: (202) 499-5209 Fax: (415) 391-8269

4 Fax: (202) 499-5199 Email: mgehrke@reedsmith.com

Email: sbireda@sanfordheisler.com

5 JILL S. VOROBIEV (pro hac vice)

CARA VAN DORN (#321669) DAVID T. HARTMANN (pro hac vice)

6 Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight, LLP Reed Smith LLP

7911 Herschel Avenue, Suite 300 10 South Wacker Drive

7 La Jolla, CA 92037 Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: (619) 577-4253 Telephone: (312) 207-1000

8 Fax: (619) 577-4250 Fax: (312) 207-6400

Email: cvandorn@sanfordheisler.com Email: jvorobiev@reedsmith.com

9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMANDA BROWN (#292559)

10 Reed Smith LLP

2850 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1500

11 Dallas, TX 75201

Telephone: (469) 680-4232

12 Email: aebrown@reedsmith.com

13 Attorneys for Defendant

14

15

16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

19 ALEX HORN, LANCE AYTMAN, AND Case No. 1:21-CV-01258-JLT-BAM

KEITH HOOKER,

20 [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING CASE

Plaintiffs,

21

District Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston

v.

22 Magistrate Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe

KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY

23 LLC, Complaint Filed: August 19, 2021

24 Defendant.

25

26

27

28

1 On December 5, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation for voluntary dismissal with

2 | prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). (Dkt. 156). Pursuant to Rule 41(a), a

3 | plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order in one of two ways: (1) by filing a notice of

4 | dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment,

5 | or (2) by stipulation of all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G) & (ii).

6 | Voluntary dismissal under this rule requires no action on the part of the court. See United States v.

7 | 475 Martin Lane, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145 (9th Cir. 2008) (voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule

8 | 41(a)(1) is self-executing and requires no further action by court).

9 Here, the parties’ joint stipulation of dismissal is consistent with Federal Rule of Civil

10 | Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i1). Thus, the parties’ stipulated dismissal of this action with prejudice,

11 | with each party bearing that party’s own attorneys’ fees and costs, is effective upon its filing and

12 | without a court order.

13 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE.

14

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 Dated: _ December 6, 2024 Charis [Tourn

TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ADRAED TA CTI ACE CAGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.