The opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL : No. 136 MM 2024
COMMITTEE AND THE REPUBLICAN :
PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, :
:
Petitioners :
:
:
v. :
:
:
ALL 67 COUNTY BOARDS OF ELECTIONS :
(ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; ALLEGHENY COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ARMSTRONG :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; BERKS COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; BLAIR COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; BRADFORD COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BUCKS COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; BUTLER :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
CAMBRIA COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; CAMERON COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; CARBON COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CENTRE :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; CLARION COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; CLEARFIELD COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CLINTON :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
COLUMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; CRAWFORD COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; CUMBERLAND :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; DELAWARE COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ELK COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; ERIE COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; FAYETTE :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
FOREST COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; FULTON COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; GREENE :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
HUNTINGDON COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; INDIANA COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; JEFFERSON COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JUNIATA :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
LACKAWANNA COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; LANCASTER COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; LAWRENCE :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
LEBANON COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; LUZERNE COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; LYCOMING COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MCKEAN :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; MIFFLIN COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; MONROE COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; MONTGOMERY :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
MONTOUR COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; NORTHAMPTON COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; PERRY COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; PHILADELPHIA COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; PIKE COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; POTTER :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; SNYDER COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; SOMERSET COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; SULLIVAN :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; TIOGA COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; UNION COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; VENANGO COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; WARREN COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS; WASHINGTON :
[136 MM 2024] - 2
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; WAYNE :
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS; :
WESTMORELAND COUNTY BOARD OF :
ELECTIONS; WYOMING COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS; AND YORK COUNTY :
BOARD OF ELECTIONS), :
:
Respondents :
DISSENTING STATEMENT
JUSTICE DONOHUE FILED: November 18, 2024
I am unpersuaded that the Republican National Committee and Republican Party
of Pennsylvania (“Petitioners”) have established grounds for this Court to exercise its
sparingly invoked King’s Bench jurisdiction because there is an avenue for review of the
challenges Petitioners raise 1 found in Section 3157 of the Election Code. I have far more
confidence in our courts of common pleas to apply the law than do some of my
colleagues.
Section 3157(a) provides in relevant part as follows:
Any person aggrieved by any order or decision of any
county board regarding the computation or canvassing
of the returns of any primary or election … may appeal
therefrom within two days after such order or decision
shall have been made, whether then reduced to writing or
not, to the court specified in this subsection, setting forth why
he feels that an injustice has been done, and praying for such
order as will give him relief. … Upon the payment to the
prothonotary of a fee for filing such appeal, a judge of the
court shall fix a time and place for hearing the matter in
dispute within three days thereafter, of which due notice
1 Although Petitioners nominally seek an exercise of our King’s Bench or extraordinary
jurisdiction, at no point do they ask the Court to assume jurisdiction over the appeals they
have pending in various courts of common pleas. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 726 (providing that
through extraordinary jurisdiction, this Court “may … assume plenary jurisdiction” over
any matter pending before a tribunal involving an issue of immediate public importance).
[136 MM 2024] - 3
shall be served, with a copy of such appeal, by the appellant
upon a member of the county board whose action is
complained of and upon every attorney, watcher or candidate
who opposed the contention of the appellant before the
county board, and upon any other person that the judge shall
direct, at least two days before the matter shall be reviewed
by the court.
25 P.S. § 3157(a) (emphasis added).
Petitioners identify three counties in which they claim the county boards of election
are improperly counting undated and/or misdated mail in ballots. Petitioners allege that
Bucks County Board of Elections has counted 405 such mail-in against the advice of its
counsel. Application for the Exercise of Kings’ Bench or Extraordinary Jurisdiction
(“Application”), 11/14/2024, at 9. Petitioners filed a statutory appeal from this
determination on November 13, 2024. See id. at 10; Philadelphia, Montgomery and
Bucks County Boards of Elections’ Answer, 11/15/2024, at 4 (citing McCormick v. Bucks
Cty. Bd. of Elecs., No. 2024-7228 (Bucks Cty.)). Petitioners further assert that
Philadelphia and Centre Counties “have similarly decided to count undated and misdated
ballots[,]” yet they provided no further detail. Application at 9. Petitioners admit that they
are challenging these decisions in the Philadelphia and Centre County Courts of Common
Pleas. Id. Respondents reveal that Petitioners filed their statutory challenge in
Philadelphia County on November 15, 2024 (the same day Petitioners filed this
Application), id., and that while Petitioners filed a statutory appeal in Centre County, it
was “dismissed with prejudice as jurisdictionally time-barred.” Centre County Board of
Election’s Response, 11/15/2024, at 3. Although they do not identify it in their Application,
Petitioners also filed a statutory appeal in Montgomery County.
By their very actions, Petitioners demonstrate that there is an existing avenue of
review for their challenges to the decisions of these Boards of Elections. For instance,
publicly available dockets reveals that a hearing is scheduled for tomorrow, November
19, 2024, in Bucks County on Petitioners’ statutory appeal. Quite simply, there is nothing
[136 MM 2024] - 4
extraordinary or urgent about the Petitioners’ challenges. They are challenging the
decision of three county boards of elections to count certain mail-in ballots. Their ability
to do so – and the timeframe in which to do so – is clearly established in Section 3157. If
the court of common pleas does not grant the relief they seek, Petitioners have the right
to appeal to the Commonwealth Court. Pursuant to an order this Court entered on August
27, 2024, the period for filing that appeal has been truncated and the appeals process
expedited, ensuring that these challenges move through the normal appellate process in
an expeditious manner. 2 Although Petitioners make the claim that time is of the essence,
they do not explain why. Any concerns about expediency have been accounted for in our
August 27, 2024 order.
Moreover, entering an order of statewide effect effectively resurrects Petitioners’
fatally untimely appeal in Centre County and awards them the relief they sought, despite
their botched attempt to comply with the terms of the Election Code, and also grants
Petitioners relief in any and all counties in which they did not file a statutory appeal. It
should not be ignored that Petitioners filed this Application after they found themselves
out of court in Centre County because of their failure to comply with the statutory appeals
timeframe. Allowing litigants to circumvent the statutorily established timeframe in
Section 3157(a) under the guise of a King’s Bench petition, in my view, causes confusion
and sows distrust in the judiciary, as the Court has voted to patently flout an appeal
2 See In re Temporary Modification and Suspension of the Rules of Appellate Procedure
and Judicial Administration for Appeals Arising Under the Pennsylvania Election Code,
622 J.A., 8/27/2024 (per curiam) (modifying Pa.R.A.P. 903(c)(1)(ii) to reduce the ten-day
appeal period for a matter arising under the Election Code to three days, modifying
Pa.R.A.P. 1113(c)(1) to reduce the ten-day period for filing a petition for allowance of
appeal from an order arising under the Election Code to three days, excluding holidays
and weekends from the calculation of these deadlines, providing that appellant’s briefs
must be filed within twenty-four hours of the notice of appeal, and providing that no reply
briefs, reconsideration or reargument petitions will be permitted).
[136 MM 2024] - 5
procedure established by our General Assembly. For these reasons, and my confidence
in our courts of common pleas to apply the law, I dissent from the order entered today.
Chief Justice Todd and Justice McCaffery join this dissenting statement.
[136 MM 2024] - 6