The opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 21-308V
GWYNETH RAMPTON, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: November 27, 2023
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
Petitioner.
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 7, 2021, Gwyneth Rampton filed a petition2 for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.3 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (SIRVA) resulting from adverse effects of an influenza (flu) vaccination she
received on October 19, 2020. Amended Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that the
1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or
at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government
Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that
the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 Petitioner filed a more detailed Amended Petition on November 19, 2022. ECF No. 21
3 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2018).
vaccination was administered within the United States, her injury lasted longer than six
months, and neither she, nor any other party, has ever received compensation in the form
of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Amended Petition at 1, 6. The
case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On October 12, 2023, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes
that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at
1. Respondent concluded that “[P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as
defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 6. Specifically, Respondent determined that
“[P]etitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder prior
to vaccination; pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination;
pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other
condition or abnormality has been identified to explain [P]etitioner’s shoulder pain.” Id.
Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for
more than six months. Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that
Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
2