Opinion

State of Tennessee v. Justin Genel Hill

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Filed
Mar 19, 2003
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Jerry L. Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.0%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

June 4, 2002 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN GENEL HILL

Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County

No. 0-201 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge

No. W2001-01274-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 19, 2003

An Obion County grand jury indicted the defendant, Justin Genel Hill, of two counts of first degree

murder and one count of conspiracy to commit first degree murder.1 In a separate indictment,

Clarence Carnell Gaston, Miqwon Deon Leach, and Mario Deangelo Thomas were also charged with

crimes arising out of the same criminal episode. The defendant and these three men were tried in

a single jury trial. The jury found Gaston, Leach, and Thomas guilty of conspiracy to commit first

degree murder, second degree murder, and first degree felony murder and found the defendant guilty

of facilitation to commit second degree murder. See State v. Clarence Carnell Gaston, No. W2001-

02046-CCA-R3-CD, 2003 WL 261941, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Jackson, Feb. 7, 2003). For the

defendant’s conviction, the trial court sentenced him to serve a ten-year sentence in the Department

of Corrections. The defendant now brings this appeal of his conviction, alleging that the evidence

introduced at trial is insufficient to support his conviction. After reviewing the record and applicable

law, we find that the defendant’s allegation lacks merit and accordingly affirm the defendant’s

conviction.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3; Judgment of the Trial Court Affirmed.

JERRY L. SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JOSEPH M. TIPTON and JAMES

CURWOOD WITT, JR., JJ., joined.

John M. Miles, Union City, Tennessee, for appellant, Justin Genel Hill.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; P. Robin Dixon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General;

Thomas A. Thomas, District Attorney General; and Jim Cannon, Assistant District Attorney General,

for appellee, State of Tennessee.

1

Nicholas And re Hanserd was also na med in the defendant’s indictm ent for having comm itted these

same charges. However, as discussed infra, Han serd negotiated a plea agreem ent with the state and testified for the state

at the defendant’s trial.

OPINION

Factual Background

Clarence Carnell Gaston, Miqwon Deon Leach, and Mario Deangelo Thomas, who were also

involved in the instant crime and who were tried for their crimes in the same trial as the defendant,

also appealed their convictions in a separate appeal. See Clarence Carnell Gaston, 2003 WL 261941,

at *1. When considering their appeal, this Court summarized the facts of the instant crime, in

relevant part, as follows:

On New Year’s Day 1999, the victim, Zachary Demond Achols, was shot and

killed as he was standing with a group of men outside the VIP Social Club at 1212

East Main Street in Union City. Jeff Young, one of the men with whom the victim

was standing, was wearing red clothing. According to eyewitnesses, a second group

of men, including defendant Gaston, approached the first group and, upon Gaston’s

direction to shoot the one in red, opened fire, striking and killing the victim. The

defendants were subsequently charged with conspiracy to commit first degree

murder, first degree felony murder, and first degree premeditated murder. Although

the State originally filed notices of its intention to seek the death penalty against the

defendants, it subsequently withdrew those notices, substituting notices of its

intention to seek life sentences without the possibility of parole. The three defendants

in this appeal and a fourth co[-]defendant, Justin Hill, who was charged with the

same offenses, were tried jointly before an Obion County Circuit Court jury from

March 12-17, 2001.

State’s Proof

Union City Police Officer Robby Orsborne testified that he was investigating

a complaint of loud music in the East College Court area at approximately 1:40 a.m.

on January 1, 1999, when he heard eight to ten gunshots from the area of Main Street

and Nash, where the VIP Club was located. Officer Stan Haskins, the first officer to

respond to the shooting, testified that as he drove to the scene he was flagged down

by one of approximately ten African-American men who were standing in a “semi-

huddled” fashion at the southwest corner of the building. When he got out of his car

and approached the group, he saw the victim lying on the ground at the corner of the

club. The victim was not breathing and had no discernible pulse.

Ted Alexander, the manager of a band that had played that evening at the

Union City VFW, located on Main Street just east of the VIP Club, was in the

parking lot behind the VFW building preparing to leave when he heard gunshots

from the direction of Main Street, near the front of the club. Alexander testified that

after calling 9-1-1 from his car phone, he saw two African-American men run to a

-2-

maroon-colored car that was parked close to his vehicle. The taller and slimmer of

the two men ran to the driver’s side of the car. The second man ran to the passenger

door, either retrieved a weapon from the car or reloaded one that he already had, and

fired three or four shots across the front of Alexander’s car at a person in a red shirt

who was running in the direction of Vine Street through a vacant lot behind the

buildings. The two men then got into their car and sped off. During the same period,

Alexander heard more gunshots fired and saw a red car pull up and then speed away.

Alexander testified that he was a retired officer of the sheriff’s department and, based

on his experience with firearms, was able to determine that the twelve to fifteen

rounds he heard fired that night came from two different caliber weapons.

Paul Warner testified that he was outside the Snack Shop, a business located

on Main Street across from the VFW, on January 1, 1999, when he heard gunfire and

looked up to see two individuals at the southwest corner of the VIP Club firing at

another individual who was running from them. Warner went into the Snack Shop

to telephone the police. While inside, he heard three or four more gunshots and

looked out the window to see someone running through the parking lot. After going

back outside, Warner saw three or four men standing in the middle of Main Street.

He said that he heard one of the men issuing directions, saying, “‘You go this way,

and you go that way, and you go this way.’” According to Warner, all of the men then

“went in different directions,” with one man running east down Main Street, another

heading west, and a third going north between the VIP Club and the VFW.

Warner testified that he saw another individual standing at the corner of the

club, looking down at the ground and nudging something with his foot. Assuming

that someone had been shot, Warner went back into the shop and phoned for an

ambulance. As he looked out the window, he noticed a man putting something into

the trunk of a blue Caprice Classic that was parked in the Snack Shop’s parking lot.

Warner said that something about the man’s appearance, perhaps his clothing, gave

him the feeling that he was one of the two gunmen he had just seen. As he watched,

the man closed the trunk and got down in the backseat of the vehicle, where he could

not be seen. Another man came from across the street, hunkered down, got into the

driver’s seat, and started the engine. As they drove off, Warner went outside and

recorded part of the vehicle’s license plate number, which he subsequently provided

to the police. On cross- examination, Warner testified that he did not remember what

the two men in the Caprice had been wearing and acknowledged that he was not

certain they had had anything to do with the shooting.

Bobby Lee Allen testified that he was walking to the VIP Club on January 1,

1999, when he saw a man “come out running across Vine Street towards E.W.

James.” Allen said there were two men behind the first man, and they “dropped down

and started shooting at him,” stopping only when their guns were empty. Because it

was dark, he could not identify any of the men involved or their race.

-3-

Union City Police Sergeant Dave Davis, the supervisor on duty at the time of

the shooting, testified that a “hostile crowd” of about 200 screaming people, in which

several fights were breaking out, was in the parking lot and around the VIP Club

when he arrived. During his initial period at the scene, when he was one of only four

officers present, he and Officer Haskins were struggling to keep the victim in one

spot while the crowd was trying to move him. After additional officers from the

police and sheriff’s departments arrived in response to his radioed calls for help, they

were able to disperse the crowd and secure the scene.

Sergeant Mike George, the first investigator to arrive, testified that officers

initially recovered eight bullet casings from the crime scene. They later found three

more, including two that were recovered from the vicinity of the E.W. James parking

lot located off Vine Street to the west of the VIP Club. A total of four bullets were

recovered: two from automobiles parked at the scene, one from the corner of a

building near the E.W. James parking lot, and one from the victim’s body. Sergeant

George testified that Warner provided the partial tag number of either “35N” or

“3NF” for the blue Caprice he had seen in the Snack Shop’s parking lot and,

additionally, reported that there was something “funny” about the license plate. A

blue Chevrolet Caprice matching Warner’s description, with a personalized

Tennessee plate and the tag number “735N,” was later located in the parking lot of

an apartment complex in Fulton, Kentucky. The vehicle was registered in the name

of LaDonna Brooks.

Dr. Cynthia Gardner, the medical examiner who performed the autopsy of the

victim’s body, testified that the victim died as the result of a gunshot wound in which

the bullet traveled in a downward path from his back into his chest, passing through

his heart and severing his spinal cord and several of his major blood vessels. She said

that the bullet entered the victim at the back of the base of his neck, went through his

spinal cord, superior vena cava, aorta, left pulmonary artery and the right ventricle

of his heart, and stopped at the space below his fourth rib. Dr. Gardner agreed that

one possible scenario that would explain the path of the bullet was that the victim

was shot by someone standing over him as he was lying on the ground. She found no

evidence of alcohol or drugs in the victim’s body. Agent Robert Daniel Royce, a

firearms examiner with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, testified that the

bullet from the victim’s body came from a .380 automatic weapon. Seven of the shell

casings recovered from the scene came from a .380 automatic, while the remaining

three shell casings came from a .9 millimeter Luger.

Jeff Young testified that he arrived at the VIP Club around midnight on New

Year’s Eve. He saw and spoke with the victim, as well as with Justin Hill and a man

named Daman Biffle. In addition to these men, he said that he saw each of the

defendants in the club. At some point, he, Jarvis Jones, Kim (“Kemp”) Brown,

Clarence Jones, and the victim decided to go outside the club, to the corner between

-4-

the VIP and the VFW, to smoke marijuana. However, before they could light their

“joint,” Gaston came around the side with a group of men. Young described what

occurred:

Well, it started when [Gaston] came to the side, and he was on the other side

of the cars that was there on the side of us, and he was saying, “Yeah, that’s him,

that’s him in the red. Shoot, shoot, shoot. Fire, fire, fire.” So, then, we all looked

back, and that’s when we seen the rest of ‘em, like, in the front of us, like, looking

to the right, and that’s when I seen [Leach]. He was-- well, we call it jackin’ the gun

off. And that’s when I started to run, and the rest of us ran.

Young testified that he never looked back to see how many people were

shooting, but Leach, who had an automatic weapon, was the only one he saw with a

gun. However, he knew there was more than one gun because he heard several shots

fired, including different rounds fired at the same time. He said that he escaped by

running to a nearby house. As he was behind the house, he saw one of Gaston’s cars,

a burgundy Buick Park Avenue, traveling up Vine Street in the direction of the club.

Young acknowledged that he was serving time for two drug convictions and was

facing charges on two additional offenses, but said that he had not been promised

anything in exchange for his testimony.

Young testified on cross-examination that he had never had any trouble with

Gaston, and he was not aware of any grudge Gaston may have held against him. He

said that Gaston was about five to ten feet from him when he first saw him outside

the club, but admitted that he may have said at the preliminary hearing that he was

thirty to forty feet away. He testified that there were at least five people with Gaston,

one of whom was Daman Biffle, and that he did not see Gaston with a gun. He

admitted that he went home to Jackson, Tennessee, after the crime and did not talk

to the police until January 6, 1999, when he telephoned a woman named Brenda

Brown at a time when Captain Barfield of the Union City Police was present at her

home. He “guess[ed]” it was true he was originally a suspect in the case, admitted

that he had not voluntarily gone to the police, and acknowledged that the first time

he talked with the police about the case, other than during his January 6 telephone

conversation with Captain Barfield, was after he was arrested. He conceded that

Thomas and Gaston were the only two defendants he named during his initial

telephone conversation with Barfield; the other men he only described. He

acknowledged having described one of the men as cross-eyed and said that Leach

was that man. He never saw Thomas with a gun. On redirect, he testified that he had

been wearing red on the night of the shooting and that he had identified Leach from

photographs shown to him by the police.

Jarvis Jones testified that he went to the VIP Club on New Year’s Eve with

Jeff Young and “Kemp.” After meeting the victim inside the club, the four of them

-5-

decided to go outside to smoke marijuana. Jones described what occurred when they

went outside:

A. Stepped outside, and no sooner did we get to the corner of the

club, some guys come out. I seen Mr. Gaston, he came out, and he

directed ‘em to us, like tellin’ ‘em to go ahead and shoot us, or

whatever.

Q. Do you recall what you heard Mr. Gaston say?

A. He said, “Red, red, let it go right there.”

Immediately after Gaston’s command, Jones saw Leach pull out a chrome

pistol. At sight of the pistol, Jones turned to run between the VIP building and the

VFW but fell to the ground when one of his companions stepped on his heel. He said

that he “sat there for a minute” and “played dead.” He then heard Gaston say, “Yeah,

you got him, you got him” and saw, out of the corner of his eye, Thomas approaching

armed with a black automatic gun. When he heard Thomas say, “Where he at, where

he at?” he jumped up and ran behind the club across the empty E.W. James parking

lot to the Stephens Motel, hearing gunshots behind him as he did so. Jones made

positive courtroom identifications of Gaston, Leach, and Thomas and testified that

he heard a total of more than ten gunshots.

On cross-examination, he testified that Gaston was alone when he first saw

him come around some cars outside the club. He heard Gaston say, “Red, red. There

them niggers go right there.” He assumed the other men, who came around within

“[s]econds” of when he first saw Gaston, came from the front of the club, “the same

place [Gaston] come from.” He went on to testify, however, that he saw Thomas

come from around the corner and that Leach was in the street. He said that he ran

when he saw Leach bring out a large, chrome pistol and that he fell to the ground

after running approximately one-third of the distance from the front corner of the

building to the back. After falling to the ground, Jones crawled between some cars

and lay still, pretending to be dead. He first recognized Leach after he had fallen to

the ground and was lying between the cars. He acknowledged having told

investigators that Leach had been wearing a hooded jacket and that he had been

unable to see the top portion of his face.

Jones provided contradictory testimony about whether he had looked

underneath or around the cars to see Thomas with the gun. Nonetheless, he was

confident he had seen Thomas and that he had had a gun. He acknowledged that it

was dark, and there were no lights in the area where he was lying. He also

acknowledged that he had only seen Thomas two or three times prior to the shooting.

Jones said he went home to Jackson, Tennessee, the day after the shooting and later

went to Mammoth Cave, Kentucky, to participate in a Job Corps program. He did not

talk to the police until they came to see him at Mammoth Cave. Jones acknowledged

-6-

he and Jeff Young had smoked marijuana and drunk alcohol earlier in the evening,

and they had discussed the shooting by telephone before he first talked to the police.

Nicholas Hansard, who said he was originally from Rockford, Illinois,

testified that he first came to Union City in August 1998. At that time, several of his

friends, including Miqwon Leach, Mario Thomas, Justin Hill, and Daman Biffle, had

already been in the area for about a month. Hansard said that approximately three

weeks before the shooting, Leach told him that he had been robbed the day before by

Red Boxley and Jeff Young. On New Year’s Eve 1998, he heard Thomas, Hill, and

Leach discussing Young, saying that if they saw him at the club they were going to

“get him.” Hansard said that he went to the club later that night with Thomas and

Thomas’ girlfriend, Toya, and saw Gaston inside the club.

Hansard testified that he was dancing with a woman named Sonya Polk when

Leach motioned him over and told him that it was about to “go down,” that they were

about to get Young. He said that he followed “‘em” outside, where he saw that both

Leach and Gaston had guns. Next, Gaston, who had a “very mean” look on his face,

pointed and said, “Get ‘em.” Hansard said that he ran and hid behind a car and then

heard gunshots. When the gunshots stopped for a moment, he peeked around the car

and saw Leach and Hill standing at the corner of the building, with Leach kicking the

victim who was lying on the ground. He did not see Gaston at that point. He next saw

Leach and Hill run across Main Street to a parking lot. He never saw Hill with a gun

and did not remember having seen Thomas outside the club.

Hansard testified that he had a conversation on January 2, 1999, with Leach

and Gaston during which Leach said he had shot the victim, and Gaston said he had

chased and fired at Jeff Young by the E.W. James parking lot. Hansard admitted that

he had been indicted for the crimes and had agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to

commit homicide, with the degree of homicide to be set after the jury returned their

verdicts in the instant case. He acknowledged that the sentence he would receive for

his conviction was to be served concurrently to the sentence he was currently serving

for a federal drug conviction. Hansard conceded he had, in the past, given several

different accounts in statements to law enforcement officials, including that he had

not been at the club, that he had been present but had stayed inside, and that he had

gone to the door but had gone back inside before the shooting started. He said,

however, that he had also previously given the same account that he was providing

at trial and that his trial testimony was the truth.

Hansard acknowledged on cross-examination that Hill, Leach, and Thomas

had merely discussed “getting” Young, which, he claimed, he had assumed meant

roughing him up; no mention had been made of shooting him. Gaston was not

present during this conversation and, to his knowledge, was also not present when

Young allegedly robbed Leach. Hansard estimated that approximately ten or fifteen

-7-

people were outside the club at the time of the shooting. He said that he did not see

either Hill or Leach get into a blue Chevrolet and never saw Hill with a gun. He did

not see Gaston, Leach, or Thomas in the street.

Demecca Holder testified that she went to the VIP Social Club early on New

Year’s Day 1999 with LaFaye Johnson and Shyretha Stevens. When they arrived at

the club, she and Johnson went inside while Stevens walked in the opposite direction.

Holder said that as they went in, Hill, Thomas, Hansard, Gaston, and a man named

Kolliepaye passed them going out. Shortly afterwards, Shyretha Stevens came inside

the club yelling that there had been a shooting. Holder admitted on cross-examination

that she had said in a statement to police that approximately twenty to thirty minutes

elapsed from the time she saw the men leave the club until Stevens came inside to

report the shooting.

LaFaye Johnson testified that it was approximately 1:00 a.m. when she,

Holder, Stevens, and several friends arrived at the VIP Club. Stevens did not go

inside but instead stayed outside to talk with someone. Johnson said that the victim

was part of a crowd of people that passed her, heading outside, as she was entering

the club. She also saw Gaston, Thomas, Hansard, and Leach leaving the club as she

went in. She said that she and her companions had just made it to the pay booth when

they heard four or five shots, and Stevens, who was crying, came in saying that “they

were shooting.”

LaDonna Brooks, the registered owner of the blue Chevrolet Caprice located

in the parking lot of the Fulton, Kentucky, apartment complex, testified that Justin

Hill gave her the money to buy the car and that he had her register it in her name. She

said Hill kept the car and drove it; she never used the vehicle.

Sonya Polk testified that she was dancing with Nick Hansard at the VIP Club

early on New Year’s Day when Leach called him to the side and spoke with him for

a moment. She said that the two men then left the club together. Polk testified on

cross-examination that she saw Gaston and his girlfriend, Raschelle, leave the club

with Thomas and his girlfriend, LaToya, going out the front door. On redirect, she

testified that it was after Gaston and Thomas had left the club that she heard

gunshots.

Sergeant Mike George, recalled by the State, testified that the front parking

lot of the VIP Club was well-lit, with floodlights all across the top of the building.

In addition to those lights, there was a security light on the side of the VFW in

between the buildings, as well as a security light on a pole at the rear of the VFW.

George said that the visibility in the area was generally good, and he had not needed

a flashlight to walk between the buildings.

-8-

Defense Proof

Gaston’s first witness, VIP Club owner Harold Hensley, testified that every

patron of his club was scanned by a metal detector, designed to detect guns or knives,

before entering the establishment. He said that he saw Gaston leaving the club on

January 1, 1999, with his girlfriend after the club had closed but did not see Gaston

leave at any other time. On cross-examination, Hensley initially testified that he had

personally scanned Gaston, Thomas, Leach, and Hill for weapons as they entered the

club. He later changed his testimony, stating that Gaston was the only one he could

remember personally scanning and that one of his employees may have scanned the

others. He had no knowledge of what weapons may have been outside the club. He

testified that Gaston and Leach had just left the club when someone told him that

there had been a shooting outside. Hensley acknowledged that Gaston’s mother was

his girlfriend, as well as a long-term employee.

Raschelle Brown testified she had been Gaston’s girlfriend for about a year

at the time the shooting occurred. She and Gaston arrived at the club before midnight

and left at about 1:00 a.m., after someone came into the club yelling that someone

had been shot. When they got outside, they saw a crowd of people gathered around

someone lying on the ground. She did not see Gaston threaten anyone at the club, or

leave the club at any time before his departure with her. On cross-examination, she

testified that both she and Gaston were searched with a metal detector before entering

the club, but Mr. Hensley was not the one who conducted the search.

Thomas’ girlfriend, Catoya Hendrix, testified that she and Thomas arrived at

the club at approximately 11:15 p.m. on New Year’s Eve and stayed about forty- five

minutes before driving to her apartment in Hickman, Kentucky. At the time they left,

she was unaware of any sort of altercation having taken place at the club. To question

her about the shooting, the police later came to the bank where she worked. Because

she was afraid and did not want to get involved, Hendrix lied in her initial statement,

telling the police that she did not know Thomas. She acknowledged that she had

discussed the case with Thomas.

Leach and Hill rested their cases without presenting any proof. After

deliberating, the jury found Leach, Gaston, and Thomas guilty of conspiracy to

commit second degree murder, first degree felony murder, and second degree murder.

Hill was found not guilty in counts one and two but guilty of facilitation of second

degree murder in count three.

Clarence Carnell Gaston, 2003 WL 261941, at *1-*8 (footnotes omitted). The trial court sentenced

the defendant to ten years for his facilitation of second degree murder conviction. He brings this

-9-

appeal challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support this conviction. After a thorough

review of the record and applicable law, we find that the defendant’s challenge lacks merit and

accordingly affirm his conviction.

Sufficiency

The defendant challenges his conviction by attacking the sufficiency of the evidence

supporting it. When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court is obliged to

review that claim according to certain well-settled principles. A verdict of guilty, rendered by a jury

and “approved by the trial judge, accredits the testimony of the” state’s witnesses and resolves all

conflicts in the testimony in favor of the state. State v. Cazes, 875 S.W.2d 253, 259 (Tenn. 1994);

State v. Harris, 839 S.W.2d 54, 75 (Tenn. 1992). Thus, although the accused is originally cloaked

with a presumption of innocence, the jury verdict of guilty removes this presumption “and replaces

it with one of guilt.” State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). Hence, on appeal, the

burden of proof rests with the defendant to demonstrate the insufficiency of the convicting evidence.

Id. The relevant question the reviewing court must answer is whether any rational trier of fact could

have found the accused guilty of every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. See Tenn.

R. App. P. 13(e); Harris, 839 S.W.2d at 75. In making this decision, we are to accord the state “the

strongest legitimate view of the evidence as well as all reasonable and legitimate inferences that may

be drawn therefrom.” See Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d at 914. As such, this Court is precluded from re-

weighing or reconsidering the evidence when evaluating the convicting proof. State v. Morgan, 929

S.W.2d 380, 383 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996); State v. Matthews, 805 S.W.2d 776, 779 (Tenn. Crim.

App. 1990). Moreover, we may not substitute our own “inferences for those drawn by the trier of fact

from circumstantial evidence.” Matthews, 805 S.W.2d at 779.

In order to prove criminal responsibility for the facilitation of a felony, the state must prove

that the defendant, “knowing that another intends to commit a specific felony, but without the intent

required under criminal responsibility under § 39-11-402(2), . . . knowingly furnishes substantial

assistance in the commission of the felony.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-403(a). Second degree

murder is defined as “the knowing killing of another.” Id. § 39-13-210.

At trial, the state introduced evidence in the form of the testimony of several witnesses

linking the defendant to the instant crime. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the

state, the defendant facilitated the planning and commission of the murder, as well as the escape

from the crime scene after the murder was accomplished. Specifically, evidence introduced at trial

indicates that, prior to the commission of the murder, the defendant discussed plans to shoot the

victim with Leach, Gaston, and Thomas, and, on the night of the murder, the defendant was present

when Gaston ordered the others to shoot the victim. Shortly after Gaston gave this order, Leach,

who was armed, announced his intention to shoot the victim, and the defendant watched as Leach

began kicking the victim. After the victim was shot, the defendant and Leach ran to a nearby parking

lot. A witness saw two men, one of which he believed to have been the shooter, run into this parking

lot and drive away from the crime scene in a blue, four-door, Chevy Caprice Classic licensed to the

defendant’s girlfriend. The defendant’s girlfriend testified that she owned a blue, four-door, Chevy

Caprice Classic, but that the defendant used her car exclusively. Based on this evidence, again

viewed in the light most favorable to the state, a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant

guilty of facilitation of second degree murder because the evidence shows that the defendant

-10-

furnished substantial assistance in the commission of the crime. We reach this conclusion on the

basis that the defendant was present while his co-defendants planned the crime and while the murder

itself was committed, and because the defendant provided Leach with a means of leaving the crime

scene. See Robert Lawrence Simpkins, Jr., No. M1998-0112-CCA-R3-CD, 2000 WL 14704, at *3

(Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Jan. 7, 2000) (finding that the defendant’s knowledge of plans to

commit the murder, presence during its commission, and aid to the gunman after the murder were

sufficient bases for supporting the defendant’s facilitation of second degree murder conviction).

Therefore, we affirm the defendant’s conviction.

Conclusion

In light of our analysis above, we find that the defendant’s appeal lacks merit. Accordingly,

the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

___________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

-11-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.