Opinion

Brown v. Sager

Court
District Court, W.D. Washington
Filed
Apr 12, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 32.5%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

7 AT SEATTLE

8 QUINTON P. BROWN,

9 Plaintiff, Case No. C23-157-LK-MLP

10 v.

PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

11 STEVEN SAGER, et al.,

12 Defendants.

13

14 This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed

15 an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. (Dkt. # 12.) Accordingly, the Court hereby establishes the

16 following pretrial schedule:

17 (1) Discovery

18 All discovery shall be completed by July 11, 2023. Service of responses to

19 interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions, and the taking of

20 depositions, shall be completed by this date. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require that

21 responses to discovery requests be served within thirty (30) days after service. See Fed. R. Civ.

22 P. 33(b)(2), 34(b)(2)(A), 36(a)(3). The serving party, therefore, must serve his/her discovery

23

1 requests at least thirty (30) days before the deadline in order to allow the other party time to

2 answer.

3 (2) Dispositive Motions

4 Any dispositive motion shall be filed and served on or before August 11, 2023. Pursuant

5 to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a part of

6 the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption

7 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for

8 consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. Dispositive motions shall be noted for

9 consideration on a date no earlier than the fourth Friday following filing and service of the

10 motion. LCR 7(d)(3).

11 All briefs and affidavits in opposition to any motion shall be filed and served pursuant to

12 the requirements of Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and LCR 7. The party making

13 a motion may file and serve a reply to the opposing party’s briefs and affidavits. Any reply brief

14 shall also be filed and served pursuant to the requirements of Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil

15 Procedure and LCR 7.

16 Defendants are reminded that they MUST serve a Rand notice, in a separate document,

17 concurrently with motions for summary judgment so that pro se prisoner plaintiffs will have fair,

18 timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in order to oppose such motions. Woods

19 v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 941 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth Circuit has set forth model language for

20 such notices:

21 A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

22

Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for

23 summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when

there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real

1 dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party

who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of

2 law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a

motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations

3 (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your

complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations,

4 depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents,

as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the

5 defendant’s declarations and documents and show that there is a

genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own

6 evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be

entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will

7 be dismissed and there will be no trial.

8 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 963 (9th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added). Defendants who fail to

9 file and serve the required Rand notice on the plaintiff may have their motion stricken from the

10 Court’s calendar with leave to re-file.

11 (3) Joint Pretrial Statement

12 The parties are advised that a due date for filing a Joint Pretrial Statement may be

13 established at a later date pending the outcome of any dispositive motions.

14 (4) Proof of Service and Sanctions

15 All motions, pretrial statements and other filings shall be accompanied by proof that such

16 documents have been served upon counsel for the opposing party or upon any party acting pro

17 se. The proof of service shall show the day and manner of service and may be by written

18 acknowledgment of service, by certificate of a member of the bar of this Court, by affidavit of

19 the person who served the papers, or by any other proof satisfactory to the Court. Failure to

20 comply with the provisions of the Order can result in dismissal/default judgment or other

21 appropriate sanctions.

22

23

1 (5) The Clerk of Court is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to

2 counsel for Defendants.

3 DATED this 12th day of April, 2023.

4

A

5

MICHELLE L. PETERSON

6 United States Magistrate Judge

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.