Opinion

Sheets v. Presseller

Court
District Court, M.D. Florida
Filed
Sep 9, 2024
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

ANDREW BRYANT SHEETS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-495-JLB-KCD

JERRY PRESSELLER, THE

DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS

COMMITTEE OF PUNTA GORDA,

INC., DAVID JOSEPH LIPKER

and CITY OF PUNTA GORDA,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

Plaintiff Andrew Sheets, proceeding without a lawyer, moves for entry

of a clerk’s default against Defendant The Downtown Merchants Committee of

Punta Gorda, Inc. (Doc. 41.)1 For the reasons below, the motion is denied.

“When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought

has failed to plead or otherwise defend and that failure is shown by affidavit

or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).

Before directing the clerk to enter a default, however, the Court must

determine whether Plaintiff properly effected service of process, for which he

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations have

been omitted in this and later citations.

bears the burden of proof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l); Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs.,

LLC, No. 2:13-CV-809-FTM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28,

2014); Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F. S.R.L., No. 6:13-CV-1811-ORL-37, 2014 WL

1400641, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2014).

Service on a corporate entity like The Downtown Merchants Committee

can be accomplished in one of three ways: (1) by requesting that the company

waive service, (2) by following the service rules of the state in which the lawsuit

is filed or where service is to be made, or (3) by delivering a summons and the

complaint to an officer, managing agent, general agent, or any other agent

authorized by law to accept service on the company’s behalf. Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(d), (h)(1).

Nothing in the record suggests that The Downtown Merchants

Committee waived service. Nor is there evidence that Plaintiff served an

officer, managing agent, general agent, or any other agent authorized by law

to accept service on the company’s behalf. The return here shows that Diane

Ford accepted service as the “office manager.” (Doc. 41-1.) Her title fits none of

the categories under Rule 4. See, e.g., Matero v. Digital Ink Americas LLC, No.

6:22-CV-1606-CEM-LHP, 2023 WL 2527046, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 15, 2023)

(explaining that service on an “office manager” is insufficient).

So that leaves Plaintiff with state law. Service on a Florida corporation

is governed by Fla. Stat. § 48.081. That statute sets forth a hierarchy of persons

who may accept service on a corporation’s behalf. Subsection (2) directs

plaintiffs to first attempt service on the registered agent. If those efforts fail,

process can be served on the chair of the board, the president, any vice

president, the secretary, the treasurer, or any person listed publicly on the

corporation’s latest annual report. Fla. Stat. § 48.081(3)(a)-(b). Finally, with a

few caveats not relevant here, the statute allows substitute service on the

Secretary of State. See Progressive Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Keechi Transp. LLC,

No. 6:22-CV-2170-WWB-RMN, 2023 WL 7410988, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 25,

2023) (outlining the sequential steps required for service on a corporation

under Florida law).

Applying these rules here, Plaintiff has not properly served The

Downtown Merchants Committee. Diane Ford signed the service return as

“office manager.” (Doc. 41-1.) But Florida law does not provide for service on

an “office manager,” and Diane Ford is not otherwise listed publicly as a

registered agent or other officer authorized to receive service on the latest

annual report filed with the Florida Division of Corporations, available at

www.sunbiz.org. Plaintiff must attempt service in compliance with § 48.081,

and the Court will provide a deadline for him to do so. See, e.g., Persaud v. MD

Audio Eng’g Inc., No. 6:23-CV-1277-CEM-LHP, 2023 WL 11256548, at *3

(M.D. Fla. Oct. 23, 2023).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs Motion for Clerk’s Default Against Defendant The

Downtown Merchants Committee of Punta Gorda, Inc. (Doc. 41) is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff must file a proof of service for Defendant The Downtown

Merchants Committee of Punta Gorda, Inc. by October 7, 2024. A failure to

file a proof of service may result in this Defendant being dropped from

this action without further notice.

ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 9, 2024.

a ie =

le le L. of al

© Kale C. Dudek

United States Magistrate Judge

Copies: All Parties of Record

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.