The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
PENNY JUANITA WHITSON, as next of kin PLAINTIFF
of Rory Allen Gregory, deceased
v. Civil No. 6:23-cv-06079-SOH-MEF
JOHN FELTS, Director, Arkansas Parole DEFENDANTS
Board, et. al.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This is a civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3), the Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief United States District Judge,
referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a Report and Recommendation.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 19) to the Court’s Order of August 3,
2023. (ECF No. 8).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed her Complaint on June 29, 2023. (ECF No. 1). In the Order provisionally
filing the case, the Court directed her to file a completed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application.
(ECF No. 3). Plaintiff did so on July 17, 2023, and was granted IFP status on July 18, 2023. (ECF
Nos. 5, 6). Plaintiff proceeds pro se. Plaintiff was incarcerated in the Arkansas Division of
Correction when she filed her Complaint. (ECF No. 1 at 1-2).
Plaintiff alleges her brother, Rory Allen Gregory, died from pneumonia caused by COVID-
19 while he was incarcerated in the Arkansas Division of Correction (“ADC”). (ECF No. 1). She
alleges Mr. Gregory died on July 19, 2020. (Id. at 9). She brings a claim for “failure to protect
with deliberate indifference” and denial of medical care under § 1983, a claim for survival under
Ark. Code. Ann. § 16-62-101, and a claim for wrongful death under Ark. Code. Ann. § 16-62-102.
(Id. at 8, 17, 27). She proceeds against all Defendants in their individual capacity. (Id. at 16, 27,
28). She seeks compensatory, punitive, and “other” damages. (Id. at 35). She does not identify
the non-monetary relief sought. As to the monetary damages, she asks for:
Compensatory - $1,000,000.00, the defendants are responsible for his unnecessary
suffering leading to death.
Punitive - $1,000,000.00, Gregory’s death could have been prevented had
defendants not violated his constitutional rights with deliberate indifference.
Mental Anguish – Grief – loss of a loved one. $1,000,000.00.
Wrongful Death - $1,000,000.00.
Plaintiff attached an affidavit to her Complaint. (Id. at 38). She states she has legal
standing to file this Complaint as the next of kin and sole beneficiary of the deceased. She
identifies herself as his only surviving sibling, states he has no other family alive, and states there
is no personal representative. (Id.).
On August 3, 2023, the undersigned entered a preservice screening Order as required under
the PLRA. (ECF No. 8). That Order advised Plaintiff that she:
cannot proceed pro se to pursue either a survival claim, under Ark. Code. Ann. §
16-62-101, or a wrongful death claim, under Ark. Code. Ann. § 16-62-102.
Additionally, for the survival claim she must be appointed the personal
representative for the estate of her deceased brother. Plaintiff is granted 30 days
from the entry of this Order, until September 2, 2023, to remedy these deficiencies
by being appointed the personal representative for her brother’s estate and by
having an attorney enter an appearance in this case. In the event she is not able to
do so by the deadline, it will be recommended that her state claims be dismissed.
Further, Plaintiff may proceed pro se for her federal § 1983 claims only if she can
provide proof that she is both the sole beneficiary and the sole creditor of her
brother’s estate by the same deadline, September 2, 2023. Alternatively, she may
have an attorney enter an appearance on her behalf in this case by September 2,
2023
(Id. at 7).
On September 1, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time, stating that three
attorneys had declined to represent her, but she was diligently attempting to seek the required
information and representation. (ECF No. 9). This Order was granted on September 6, 2023, and
Plaintiff was given until October 6, 2023, to respond. (ECF No. 10). On September 7, 2023,
Plaintiff filed a Notice of Address change indicating she was no longer incarcerated, and mail
previously sent to her in the ADC was returned indicating she had been paroled. (ECF Nos. 11,
15). On September 14, 2023, Plaintiff filed a second Motion for Extension of Time, stating she
had been released from prison on September 1, 2023. (ECF No. 14). This motion was granted on
September 26, 2023. (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff filed another change of address on October 12, 2023.
(ECF No. 18).
Plaintiff eventually filed her Response to the Order on November 6, 2023. (ECF No. 19).
She makes the following statements in her Response. She has been unable to obtain counsel to
represent her. (Id. at 2). She is a convicted felon and is, therefore, unable to be appointed personal
representative for her brother’s estate under Ark. Code. Ann. § 28-48-101. (Id.). She was certified
as the sole beneficiary and Distributee of her brother’s estate in July 2023. (Id.). She attaches a
copy of an obituary notice for her mother, which includes a listing of her surviving children,
grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. (Id. at 5-6). She also attaches a copy of a form Affidavit
for Collection of a Small Estate by Distributee. (Id. at 6-7).
II. ANALYSIS
As the Court noted in its previous Order, “[a] non-attorney administrator for an estate may
represent an estate in federal court only when they are the sole beneficiary and the sole creditor of
the estate.” Jones ex rel. Jones v. Correctional Med. Services, Inc., 401 F.3d 950, 951-52 (8th Cir.
2005). Because Plaintiff is a convicted and unpardoned felon, she is not qualified to serve as the
administrator for her brother’s estate under Ark Code. Ann. § 28-48-101(b)(3).1 See Est. of Taylor
0F
v. MCSA, LLC, 2013 Ark. 429, 430 S.W.3d 120, 122 (son’s appointment as personal representative
of his father’s estate for purpose of nursing home abuse claim was voided after it was discovered
during a deposition that he was a convicted felon). Plaintiff appears to argue that her status as the
sole distributee of the estate makes her eligible to serve as an estate administrator under § 28-48-
101(a)(3). While the statute does list persons entitled to a distributive share of the estate as eligible
to serve as administrator, the plain language of the statute also limits that entitlement to those “who
are not disqualified.” Ark. Code. Ann. § 28-48-101(a). Unpardoned felons are expressly
disqualified. As Plaintiff cannot be appointed the administrator of her brother’s estate, she cannot
represent the estate in federal court. The Court further notes that Plaintiff was released from
incarceration on September 1, 2023, and has been given two generous extensions of time to address
any issues barring this case from moving forward. She has not done so.
III. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, it is recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of the Report and Recommendation
in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely
objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are
1 The statute uses the phrase “personal representative” to the estate. This personal representative
is either an administrator (for an intestate estate) or an executor (for a testate estate). 4 Lynn Foster
& G.S. Brant Perkins, Arkansas Probate & Estate Admin. § 1:5, n. 1. (Sept. 2023 update).
reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the
district court.
DATED this 15th day of November 2023.
/s/
HON. MARK E. FORD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE