dismissing appeal from probation-violation judgment that was mooted by completion of sentence
How later courts described this case
- dismissing appeal from probation-violation judgment that was mooted by completion of sentence
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
454
Submitted April 11, appeals dismissed as moot May 4, 2022
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
MACKENZIE AUSTIN MORTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Yamhill County Circuit Court
18CR64414, 19CR11056;
A174655 (Control), A174656
508 P3d 598
John L. Collins, Judge.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Mark Kimbrell, Deputy Public Defender, Office
of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant
Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Powers, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge,
and Hellman, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appeals dismissed as moot.
Cite as 319 Or App 454 (2022) 455
PER CURIAM
In these consolidated cases concerning convic-
tions for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII),
defendant appeals from judgments revoking his probation
and sentencing him to 30 days in jail in one case and 45
days in jail in the other case, arguing that the trial court
plainly erred in accepting his admissions to numerous pro-
bation violations. The state asserts that the case is moot,
given that the jail sentences have long since been served.
In response, defendant argues that the stigma associated
with probation revocations is essentially the same as the
stigma associated with a conviction or a contempt sanction.
We disagree that this leads to a conclusion that the case is
not moot; the stigma of DUII convictions is essentially the
same whether or not a defendant serves 30 or 45 days in
jail on those convictions. This court has consistently held
that cases in this posture are moot. See, e.g., State v. Smith
(A134313), 223 Or App 250, 195 P3d 467 (2008) (dismissing
appeal from probation-violation judgment that was mooted
by completion of sentence); State v. Dick, 169 Or App 649, 10
P3d 315 (2000) (same); cf., Dunn v. Board of Parole, 310 Or
App 249, 487 P3d 410, rev den, 368 Or 702 (2021) (challenge
to post-prison supervision jail sanction mooted by comple-
tion of sanction).
Appeals dismissed as moot.