Opinion

Zimmerman, D., Aplts v. Schmidt, A.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.7%

“In determining whether a party is indispensable, the basic inquiry remains whether justice can be done in the absence of a third party.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

How later courts described this case

  • “In determining whether a party is indispensable, the basic inquiry remains whether justice can be done in the absence of a third party.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

[J-80-2024]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID H. ZIMMERMAN AND KATHY L. : No. 63 MAP 2024

RAPP, :

: Appeal from the Order of the

Appellants : Commonwealth Court at No. 33 MD

: 2024 dated August 23, 2024.

:

v. : SUBMITTED: September 9, 2024

:

:

AL SCHMIDT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY :

AS ACTING SECRETARY OF THE :

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, :

THE COMMONWEALTH OF :

PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF :

STATE, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ARMSTRONG :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, BEDFORD COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, BERKS COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, BLAIR COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, BRADFORD COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BUCKS COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BUTLER :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

CAMBRIA COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, CAMERON COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, CARBON COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CENTRE :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, CLARION COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, CLEARFIELD COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CLINTON :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

COLUMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, CRAWFORD COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CUMBERLAND :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ELK COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ERIE COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, FAYETTE :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

FOREST COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, FULTON COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, GREENE :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

HUNTINGDON COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, INDIANA COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, JEFFERSON COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JUNIATA :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

LYCOMING COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, LACKAWANNA COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, LANCASTER :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, LEBANON COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, LEHIGH COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, LUZERNE :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

MCKEAN COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, MERCER COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, MIFFLIN COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, MONROE :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, MONTOUR COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, PERRY COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, PIKE COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, POTTER :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

SCHUYLKILL COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, SNYDER COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, SOMERSET COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SULLIVAN :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, TIOGA COUNTY BOARD OF :

[J-80-2024] - 2

ELECTIONS, UNION COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, VENANGO COUNTY BOARD :

OF ELECTIONS, WARREN COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, WASHINGTON :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

WAYNE COUNTY BOARD OF :

ELECTIONS, WESTMORELAND COUNTY :

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, WYOMING :

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, AND :

YORK COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, :

:

Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2024, the Order of the Commonwealth

Court is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court with

direction to dismiss the suit with prejudice. The Commonwealth Court lacked original

subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter because neither the Secretary of State,

Al Schmidt, nor the Department of State is an indispensable party, as required by the

Judicial Code. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 761(a)(1); Penn State Educ. Ass’n v. Commonwealth,

Dept. of Community & Econ. Dev., 50 A.3d 1263, 1277 (Pa. 2012) (“In determining

whether a party is indispensable, the basic inquiry remains whether justice can be done

in the absence of a third party.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Sprague v. Casey,

550 A.2d 184, 189 (Pa. 1988) (“A party is indispensable when his or her rights are so

connected with the claims of the litigants that no decree can be made without impairing

those rights. . . . In this connection, if the merits of a case can be determined without

prejudice to the rights of an absent party, the court may proceed.”). The Petition for

Review, as further elaborated in the Appellants’ brief before this Court, seeks relief that,

if warranted, could be granted solely by and through the County Boards of Elections.

[J-80-2024] - 3

However, the County Boards of Elections are not Commonwealth parties, and therefore

provide no basis for the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction. See 42 Pa.C.S.

§§ 102 (defining “Commonwealth government” to exclude any political subdivision,

municipal or other local authority, or any officer or agency of any such political subdivision

or authority”).

The Joinder of Appellee Cambria County Board of Elections to Brief of Appellees

Secretary of State Al Schmidt and Department of State is DENIED as moot.

Justice Brobson files a concurring statement.

[J-80-2024] - 4

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.