Opinion

In Re John Therrin Baldwin v. the State of Texas

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Filed
Aug 23, 2024
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.5%

“Jurisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus relief on a final felony conviction rests exclusively with this Court.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Jurisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus relief on a final felony conviction rests exclusively with this Court.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00522-CV

In re John Therrin Baldwin

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator John Therrin Baldwin has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus

asking this Court to direct the Travis County District Clerk to transmit a copy of his application

for writ of habeas corpus and all related filings to the Court of Criminal Appeals in accordance

with article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art.

11.07, § 3(c).

Article 11.07 vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final

felony convictions in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. art. 11.07; Board of Pardons

& Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1995) (“Jurisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus relief on a final felony

conviction rests exclusively with this Court.”); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex. App.—

Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding) (explaining in context of application for writ of habeas corpus,

that applicant seeking relief from action or inaction of convicting court “may seek mandamus

relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals”). Further, relator seeks a writ of mandamus against

the Travis County District Clerk and has not shown how the writ is necessary to enforce this

Court’s jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(a) (authorizing courts of appeals to issue

writs of mandamus “necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court”), (b) (generally

authorizing courts of appeals to issue writs against judges of specified courts).

Because we lack jurisdiction to grant the requested relief, we dismiss Baldwin’s

petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07; Tex. Gov’t Code

22.221(a), (b).

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Justices Kelly, Smith, and Theofanis

Filed: August 23, 2024

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.