Opinion

Banyan GW, LLC v. Wayne Preparatory Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Apr 3, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 188A18-2

Filed 3 April 2020

BANYAN GW, LLC

v.

WAYNE PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. and its BOARD

OF DIRECTORS; SHARON THOMPSON, Chair of the Board of Directors; and

JOHN ANKENEY and LUCIUS J. STANLEY, as members of the Board of

Directors; and VERTEX III, LLC

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the unpublished decision of a

divided panel of the Court of Appeals, No. COA18-378, 2019 WL 438327 (N.C. Ct.

App. Feb. 5, 2019), affirming an order granting partial summary judgment in favor

of plaintiff and denying defendant Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School,

Inc.’s motion for summary judgment entered on 6 November 2017 by Judge Carl R.

Fox in Superior Court, Wake County. On 30 October 2019, the Supreme Court

allowed defendant Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School, Inc.’s petition for

discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court on 10 March

2020.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, L.L.P., by J. Mitchell

Armbruster, for plaintiff-appellee Banyan GW, LLC.

Haithcock, Barfield, Hulse & Kinsey, P.L.L.C., by Glenn A. Barfield, and

Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, by Richard A. Vinroot, for defendant-appellant

Wayne Preparatory Academy Charter School, Inc.

No brief for defendant-appellees Board of Directors, Sharon Thompson, John

Ankeney, Lucius J. Stanley, and Vertex III, LLC.

PER CURIAM.

BANYAN GW, LLC V. WAYNE PREPARATORY ACAD. CHARTER SCH., INC.

Opinion of the Court

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the

majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for

discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed. Therefore,

the decision of the Court of Appeals as to these matters remains undisturbed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

-2-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.