Opinion

Everton Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 30, 2013
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1876

EVERTON BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District

Judge. (1:12-cv-01954-WDQ)

Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Everton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United

States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Everton Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action seeking relief under the Freedom of

Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2013), for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United

States Dep’t of Justice, No. 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ (D. Md. June 12,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.